From limits of quantum operations to multicopy entanglement witnesses and state-spectrum estimation
Abstract
Limits of state transformations in quantum mechanics are studied. Impossibility of physical implementation of the transformation ${\ensuremath{\varrho}}^{\ensuremath{\bigotimes}n}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\varrho}}^{n}$ in quantum mechanics is proved. The most natural notions of structural completely positive approximation and structural physical approximations of nonphysical map are introduced. It is shown that these always exist for linear Hermitian maps and can be optimized under natural conditions. It is pointed out that it is physically possible to measure in a simple way the traces of $n\mathrm{th}$ power of quantum state $\mathrm{Tr}({\ensuremath{\varrho}}^{n})$ if only joint measurements on n copies of the system are allowed. This gives the interpretation of Tsallis entropies as values of ``multicopy'' observables. Following this observations, the notion of multicopy entanglement witnesses is defined and examples are provided. Finally, using notion of multicopy observable, a simple method of spectrum state estimation is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The setup enables entanglement swapping and measuring multicopy entanglement witnesses.
“Moreover, the setup enables entanglement swapping and measuring multicopy entanglement witnesses as inspired by Refs.55,56.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062 · see citing works
Bowdrey, M. D., Oi, D. K. L., Short, A. J., Banaszek, K., & Jones, J. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00069-5 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Estimating the spectrum of a density operator
Keyl, M., & Werner, R. F. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052311 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401 · see citing works
Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices
Koczor, B. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031057 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography
Abo, S., Soubusta, J., Jiráková, K., Bartkiewicz, K., Černoch, A., Lemr, K., & Miranowicz, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35015-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horodecki, P.
- Affiliations
- Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Horodecki, Paweł
- ORCID
- Horodecki, Paweł
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-11-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2068691181
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum state transformation, quantum operations, Tsallis entropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review