Fidelity of single qubit maps
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The average fidelity depends only on the noise operator and can be expressed in a known form.
“Due to the invariance of the Fubini-Study measure the average fidelity depends only on the noise operator and can been expressed in the form [9, 10, 11]”
From Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators (2005) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
Ernst, R. R., Bodenhausen, G., Wokaun, A. J., & Redfield, A. G. (1989) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811094 · Cited by 4,202 · see citing works
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263 · see citing works
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions
Redpath, T. W. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(88)90413-4 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy
Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F., & Havel, T. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1634 · Cited by 964 · see citing works
Levitt, M. H. (1986) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-x · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate
Poyatos, J. F., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.390 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning
Bruß, D., DiVincenzo, D. P., Ekert, A., Fuchs, C. A., Macchiavello, C., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2368 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Jones, J. A. (2001) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/s0079-6565(00)00033-9 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationEitel, K. (2000) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/2/1/301 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Universal manipulation of a single qubit
Hardy, L., & Song, D. D. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032304 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Nonlinear qubit transformations
Hardy, L., & Song, D. D. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.032301 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]D. G. Cory, A. F. Fahmy and T. F. Havel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 , 1634 (1997).
- [13]R. Freeman, 'Spin Choreography,' Spektrum, Oxford, (1997).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NMR techniques for quantum control and computation
Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Chuang, I. L. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Simple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits
Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J. M., Rebentrost, P., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.110501 · Cited by 814 · see citing works
A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation
Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01272-0 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes
Gilchrist, A., Langford, N. K., & Nielsen, M. A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062310 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
Emerson, J., Alicki, R., & Życzkowski, K. (2005) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Specht, H., Nölleke, C., Reiserer, A., Uphoff, M., Figueroa, E. V., Ritter, S., & Rempe, G. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09997 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Ancilla-Assisted Quantum Process Tomography
Altepeter, J. B., Branning, D. A., Jeffrey, E. R., Wei, T.-C., Kwiat, P. G., Thew, R., O’Brien, J. L., Nielsen, M. A., & White, A. G. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.193601 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Fidelity of quantum operations
Pedersen, L. H., Møller, N. M., & Mølmer, K. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.02.069 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator
Gambetta, J. M., Motzoi, F., Merkel, S. T., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012308 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under ambient conditions
Rong, X., Geng, J., Shi, F., Liu, Y., Xu, K., Ma, W., Kong, F., Jiang, Z. L., Wu, Y., & Du, J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9748 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
A photon–photon quantum gate based on Rydberg interactions
Tiarks, D., Schmidt-Eberle, S., Stolz, T., Rempe, G., & Dürr, S. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0313-7 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Average fidelity between random quantum states
Życzkowski, K., & Sommers, H.-J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032313 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Benchmarking Quantum Computers and the Impact of Quantum Noise
Resch, S., & Karpuzcu, U. R. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3464420 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
A photon-photon quantum gate based on Rydberg interactions
Tiarks, D., Schmidt-Eberle, S., Stolz, T., Rempe, G., & Dürr, S. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Theory of Fast Optical Spin Rotation in a Quantum Dot Based on Geometric Phases and Trapped States
Economou, S. E., & Reinecke, T. L. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.217401 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Randomized benchmarking with gate-dependent noise
Wallman, J. J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-01-29-47 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Noise-Resistant Control for a Spin Qubit Array
Kestner, J. P., Wang, X., Bishop, L. S., Barnes, E., & Sarma, S. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.140502 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Accurate Qubit Control with Single Flux Quantum Pulses
McDermott, R., & Vavilov, M. (2014) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.2.014007 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
From limits of quantum operations to multicopy entanglement witnesses and state-spectrum estimation
Horodecki, P. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.052101 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Demonstration of a parametrically activated entangling gate protected from flux noise
Hong, S., Papageorge, A. T., Sivarajah, P., Crossman, G., Didier, N., Polloreno, A., Sete, E. A., Turkowski, S., Silva, M. P. D., & Johnson, B. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012302 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Teleporting a rotation on remote photons
Xiang, G., Li, J., & Guo, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.044304 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A Generic Security Proof for Quantum Key DistributionPreprint
Christandl, M., Renner, R., & EKERT, A. K. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0402131 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Du, J., Zou, P., & Wang, Z. D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.020302 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Universal Fidelity Reduction of Quantum Operations from Weak Dissipation
Abad, T., Fernández-Pendás, J., Kockum, A. F., & Johansson, G. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.150504 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Effect of noise on geometric logic gates for quantum computation
Blais, A., & Tremblay, A. –. S. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012308 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Bose-Einstein condensate as a quantum memory for a photonic polarization qubit
Riedl, S., Lettner, M., Vo, C., Baur, S., Rempe, G., & Dürr, S. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.022318 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Single-Qubit Gates for Two-Electron Spin Qubits in GaAs
Cerfontaine, P., Botzem, T., Divincenzo, D. P., & Bluhm, H. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.150501 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fast three-qubit Toffoli quantum gate based on three-body Förster resonances in Rydberg atoms
Beterov, I. I., Ashkarin, I. N., Yakshina, E. A., Tretyakov, D. B., Entin, V. M., Ryabtsev, I. I., Cheinet, P., Pillet, P., & Saffman, M. E. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042704 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Geometric formalism for constructing arbitrary single-qubit dynamically corrected gates
Zeng, J., Yang, C. H., Dzurak, A. S., & Barnes, E. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052321 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Hardware-Efficient Qubit Control with Single-Flux-Quantum Pulse Sequences
Li, K., McDermott, R., & Vavilov, M. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.014044 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Robustness of quantum memories based on Majorana zero modes
Mazza, L., Rizzi, M., Lukin, M. D., & Cirac, J. I. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.205142 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Energy-efficient quantum computing
Ikonen, J., Salmilehto, J., & Möttönen, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0015-5 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Quantum teleportation with atoms: quantum process tomography
Riebe, M., Chwalla, M., Benhelm, J., Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C. F., & Blatt, R. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/7/211 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Practical Experimental Certification of Computational Quantum Gates Using a Twirling Procedure
Moussa, O., Silva, M. P. D., Ryan, C. A., & Laflamme, R. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.070504 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Sensitivity of quantum gate fidelity to laser phase and intensity noise
Jiang, X., Scott, J., Friesen, M. G., & Saffman, M. E. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.042611 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Optimal teleportation via noisy quantum channels without additional qubit resources
Im, D.-G., Lee, C.-H., Kim, Y., Nha, H., Kim, M. S., Lee, S.-W., & Kim, Y.-H. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00426-x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Randomized Benchmarking of Barrier versus Tilt Control of a Singlet-Triplet Qubit
Zhang, C., Throckmorton, R. E., Yang, X.-C., Wang, X., Barnes, E., & Sarma, S. D. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.216802 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
High-fidelity geometric gate for silicon-based spin qubits
Zhang, C., Chen, T., Li, S., Wang, X., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052302 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Dissipative and non-dissipative single-qubit channels: dynamics and geometry
Omkar, S., Srikanth, R., & Banerjee, S. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0628-3 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
High-fidelity state detection and tomography of a single-ion Zeeman qubit
Keselman, A., Glickman, Y., Akerman, N., Kotler, S., & Ozeri, R. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073027 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Protected quantum-state transfer in decoherence-free subspaces
Qin, W., Wang, C. X., & Zhang, X. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042303 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Geometric phases in open tripod systems
Møller, D., Madsen, L. B., & Mølmer, K. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.022306 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
No-Go Theorems for Quantum Resource Purification: New Approach and Channel Theory
Fang, K., & Liu, Z.-W. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010337 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Scalable and High-Fidelity Quantum Random Access Memory in Spin-Photon Networks
Chen, K. C., Dai, W., Errando-Herranz, C., Lloyd, S., & Englund, D. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030319 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Efficient Simulation of Random Quantum States and OperatorsPreprint
Dankert, C. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0512217 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Dynamically corrected gates for an exchange-only qubit
Hickman, G., Wang, X., Kestner, J. P., & Sarma, S. D. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.161303 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
General solution to inhomogeneous dephasing and smooth pulse dynamical decoupling
Zeng, J., Deng, X.-H., Russo, A., & Barnes, E. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aaafe9 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Exchange-controlled single-electron-spin rotations in quantum dots
Coish, W. A., & Loss, D. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.161302 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Single-Qubit Gates with Errors at the 10 − 7 Level
Smith, M. C., Leu, A. D., Miyanishi, K., Gely, M. F., & Lucas, D. M. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/42w2-6ccy · Cited by 35 · see citing works
State transfer in dissipative and dephasing environments
Hu, M. (2010) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2010-00183-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Realization of universal optimal quantum machines by projective operators and stochastic maps
Sciarrino, F., Sias, C., Ricci, M., & Martini, F. D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052305 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Experimental quantum channel simulation
Lu, H., Liu, C., Wang, D., Chen, L.-K., Li, Z.-D., Yao, X.-C., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Peng, C.-Z., Sanders, B. C., et al. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042310 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Characterization of Unruh channel in the context of open quantum systems
Banerjee, S., Alok, A. K., Omkar, S., & Srikanth, R. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)082 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Yin, Z., Han, Q., & Li, T. (2019) · Optical Materials Express · doi:10.1364/ome.9.004654 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Quantum optimal control using phase-modulated driving fields
Tian, J., Liu, H., Liu, Y., Yang, P., Betzholz, R., Said, R. S., Jelezko, F., & Cai, J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.043707 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030306 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Dakir, Y., Slaoui, A., Mohamed, A. A., Laamara, R. A., & Eleuch, H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46396-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Remote implementation of quantum operations
Huelga, S. F., Plenio, M. B., Xiang, G., Li, J., & Guo, G. (2005) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/026 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Single-bit feedback and quantum-dynamical decoupling
Ticozzi, F., & Viola, L. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.052328 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Mukai, H., Sakata, K., Devitt, S. J., Wang, R., Zhou, Y., Nakajima, Y., & Tsai, J.-S. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab7d7d · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Designing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals
Kinos, A., Rippe, L., Kröll, S., & Walther, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052624 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Genov, G. T., Aharon, N., Jelezko, F., & Retzker, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab2afd · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Unsuitability of cubic phase gates for non-Clifford operations on Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states
Hastrup, J., Larsen, M. V., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S., Menicucci, N. C., & Andersen, U. L. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032409 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Average fidelity in n-qubit systems
Cabrera, R., & Baylis, W. E. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.03.068 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Robust two-qubit gates for exchange-coupled qubits
Setiawan, F., Hui, H.-Y., Kestner, J. P., Wang, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.085314 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Fundamental Bounds in Measurements for Estimating Quantum States
Lim, H., Ra, Y.-S., Hong, K.-H., Lee, S.-W., & Kim, Y.-H. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020504 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Rojas, M., de Souza, S. M., & Rojas, O. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.12.033 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Quantum Computer-Aided Design: Digital Quantum Simulation of Quantum Processors
Kyaw, T. H., Menke, T., Sim, S., Anand, A., Sawaya, N. P. D., Oliver, W. D., Guerreschi, G. G., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044042 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Minimal measurements of the gate fidelity of a qudit map
Bagán, E., Baig, M., & Muñoz-Tapia, R. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.014303 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Robustness against parametric noise of nonideal holonomic gates
Lupo, C., Aniello, P., Napolitano, M., & Florio, G. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012309 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Protecting Quantum Information via Destructive Interference of Correlated Noise
Salhov, A., Cao, Q., Cai, J., Retzker, A., Jelezko, F., & Genov, G. T. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.223601 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Noise-compensating pulses for electrostatically controlled silicon spin qubits
Wang, X., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Rana, M. S., Kestner, J. P., Barnes, E., & Sarma, S. D. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.155306 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Noise filtering of composite pulses for singlet-triplet qubits
Yang, X.-C., & Wang, X. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep28996 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Accelerated adiabatic quantum gates: Optimizing speed versus robustness
Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032323 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Quantum control of spin qubits using nanomagnets
Niknam, M., Chowdhury, M. F. F., Rajib, M. M., Misba, W. A., Schwartz, R. N., Wang, K. L., Atulasimha, J., & Bouchard, L. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-01041-8 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The distribution of quantum fidelities
Pedersen, L. H., Møller, N. M., & Mølmer, K. (2008) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2008.10.034 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Quantum gate fidelity in terms of Choi matrices
Johnston, N., & Kribs, D. W. (2011) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/49/495303 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Engineering Fast High-Fidelity Quantum Operations With Constrained Interactions
Roque, T. F., Clerk, A. A., & Ribeiro, H. (2021) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Procedures for realizing an approximate universal-not gate
Bang, J., Lee, S.-W., Jeong, H., & Lee, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.062317 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Fast control of semiconductor qubits beyond the rotating-wave approximation
Song, Y., Kestner, J. P., Wang, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.012321 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Transfer of a quantum state from a photonic qubit to a gate-defined quantum dot
Joecker, B., Cerfontaine, P., Haupt, F., Schreiber, L. R., Kardynal, B. E., & Bluhm, H. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.205415 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2021) · University of Chicago · doi:10.6082/hfwax-5pa07 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Gauge invariant information concerning quantum channels
Rudnicki, Ł., Puchała, Z., & Zyczkowski, K. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-04-11-60 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Jaouadi, A., Barrez, E., Justum, Y., & Desouter-Lecomte, M. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4812317 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Controlling NMR spin systems for quantum computation
Jones, J. A. (2024) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2024.02.002 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationModeling Low- and High-Frequency Noise in Transmon Qubits with Resource-Efficient Measurement
Tripathi, V., Chen, H., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010320 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Simplified quantum error detection and correction for superconducting qubits
Keane, K., & Korotkov, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.012333 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Quantum reference frames and the classification of rotationally invariant maps
Boileau, J.-C., Sheridan, L., Laforest, M., & Bartlett, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2884583 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Speeding up qubit control with bipolar single-flux-quantum pulse sequences
Vozhakov, V. A., Bastrakova, M. V., Klenov, N. V., Михайлович, С. А., & Soloviev, I. I. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acd9e6 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Avoiding Leakage and Errors Caused by Unwanted Transitions in Lambda Systems
Vezvaee, A., Takou, E., Hilaire, P., Doty, M. F., & Economou, S. E. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030312 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lim, H., Ra, Y.-S., Kim, Y., Bae, J., & Kim, Y.-H. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.020301 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Robust charge-based qubit encoding
Oi, D. K. L., Schirmer, S. G., Greentree, A. D., & Stace, T. M. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.075348 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationThermal quantum correlations and teleportation in a graphene sheet
Bhuvaneswari, S., Muthuganesan, R., & Radha, R. (2023) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-023-08013-y · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Controlled phase gate for solid-state charge-qubit architectures
Schirmer, S. G., Oi, D. K. L., & Greentree, A. D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012325 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationFault Models for Quantum Mechanical Switching NetworksPreprint
Biamonte, J. S. A. J. D., Allen, J., & Perkowski, M. A. (2005) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Comparing the quantum switch and its simulations with energetically constrained operations
Fellous-Asiani, M., Mothe, R., Bresque, L., Dourdent, H., Camati, P. A., Abbott, A. A., Auffèves, A., & Branciard, C. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.023111 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Analysis of loss correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code
Hastrup, J., & Andersen, U. L. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.052413 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Optimized quantum state transfer through an XY spin chain
Liu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.062331 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Limits to Quantum Gate Fidelity from Near-Field Thermal and Vacuum Fluctuations
Sun, W., Bharadwaj, S., Yang, L., Hsueh, Y., Wang, Y., Jiao, D., Rahman, R., & Jacob, Z. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.064038 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Teleportation between distant qudits via scattering of mobile qubits
Ciccarello, F., Bose, S., & Zarcone, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042318 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bowdrey, M. D., Oi, D. K. L., Short, A. J., Banaszek, K., & Jones, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Jonathan A.
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 258-260
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170140113
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- average fidelity, single-qubit operations, unitary operators, quantum channel characterization, nuclear magnetic resonance, quantum state preparation and measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
