The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bounds on the probability of success of postselected nonlinear sign shifts implemented with linear optics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For three photons, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour.
“For three photons for example, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour [146][147][148].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [148]
The Introduction (page unavailable) defines nonlinear and conditional sign-shift gates, and Section III (page unavailable) applies a conditional sign shift to a two-photon state across three modes. Neither passage addresses three-photon scattering or says that describing it requires an additional collective phase. Searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredKnill (2003) demonstrated that feed-forward cannot increase the success probability of the NS gate to unity, and that the highest possible success probability for the NS gate using feed-forward is one half.
“As mentioned before, Knill (2003) demonstrated that this is not the case, and that instead the highest possible success probability for the NS gate (using feed-forward) is one half.”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Knill (2003)
The general upper bound for such gates is 1/2.
“The general upper bound for such gates was found to be 1/2 (Knill 2003).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Knill 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Encoding a qubit in an oscillator
Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A., & Preskill, J. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012310 · Cited by 1,532
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- E. Knill, 2001, Nature (London), 409, 46, 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Yoran, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 037903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903 · DOI · Paper page
- E. Knill, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 052306, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052306 · DOI · Paper page
- M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
- T. B. Pittman, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
- T. B. Pittman, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 052305, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052305 · DOI
- T. C. Ralph, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 012314, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
- J. D. Franson, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 137901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137901 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Lütkenhaus, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 3295, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Calsamiglia, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 030301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030301 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Optical generation of matter qubit graph states
Benjamin, S. C., Eisert, J., & Stace, T. M. (2005) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/194 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Knill, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-12-18
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
