The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum gates using linear optics and postselection
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Knill (2002) CZ gate has success probability 2/27 and is the most efficient CZ gate known to date.
“Finally, in Fig. 10, the circuit of the CZ gate by Knill (2002) is shown.The success probability is 2/27.This is the most efficient CZ gate known to date.”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Knill (2002)
Section III, “Conditional Phase Shifts” (page unavailable), reports a conditional sign-flip gate with success probability 2/27, improving on the 1/16 solution it compares against. It does not establish that this is the most efficient CZ gate known to date; the section says whether the reported solutions are optimal remains an open problem. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSimilar concepts and results, such as a zero-transmission law for various output distributions, can be generalized to n bosons sent in the n ports of a Bell-multiport.
“Furthermore, similar concepts and results, such as a zero-transmission law for various output distributions, can also be generalized to n bosons sent in the n ports of a Bell-multiport [149][150][151][152].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [152]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Self-citationElementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Encoding a qubit in an oscillator
Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A., & Preskill, J. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012310 · Cited by 1,532
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- N. Lütkenhaus, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 3295, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
- M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Optical Quantum Computation Using Cluster States
Nielsen, M. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 · Cited by 614
Frequency-encoded photonic qubits for scalable quantum information processing
Lukens, J. M., & Lougovski, P. (2017) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.4.000008 · Cited by 312
Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis
Langford, N. K., Weinhold, T. J., Prevedel, R., Resch, K. J., Gilchrist, A., O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., & White, A. G. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210504 · Cited by 262
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Laser written circuits for quantum photonics
Meany, T., Gräfe, M., Heilmann, R., Perez‐Leija, A., Gross, S., Steel, M. J., Withford, M. J., & Szameit, A. (2015) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.201500061 · Cited by 230
Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling
Deshpande, A., Mehta, A., Vincent, T., Quesada, N., Hinsche, M., Ioannou, M., Madsen, L., Lavoie, J., Qi, H., Eisert, J., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7894 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Knill, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-11-14
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
