Cited by 315Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Quantum teleportation of an arbitrary two qubit state and its relation to multipartite entanglement

Open access
Rigolin, Gustavo·2005·Physical Review A

Abstract

We explicitly show a protocol in which an arbitrary two qubit state $\ensuremath{\mid}\ensuremath{\phi}⟩=a\ensuremath{\mid}00⟩+b\ensuremath{\mid}01⟩+c\ensuremath{\mid}10⟩+d\ensuremath{\mid}11⟩$ is faithfully and deterministically teleported from Alice to Bob. We construct the 16 orthogonal generalized Bell states that can be used to teleport the two qubits. The local operations Bob must perform on his qubits in order to recover the teleported state are also constructed. They are restricted only to single-qubit gates. This means that a controlled-NOT gate is not necessary to complete the protocol. A generalization where $N$ qubits are teleported is also shown. We define a generalized magic basis, which possesses interesting properties. These properties help us to suggest a generalized concurrence from which we construct a measure of entanglement that has a clear physical interpretation: A multipartite state has maximum entanglement if it is a genuine quantum teleportation channel.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.71.032303

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the specific case of two-level systems, the choice c^(1234)_4 measures the potential of a given state for multi-particle teleportation.

    “In the specific case of two-level systems, this particular choice of c (1234) 4 measures the potential of a given state for multi-particle teleportation [72].”

    From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [72]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rigolin, G.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Rigolin, Gustavo
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2005-03-07
Volume
71
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2086965045
Cited by
315
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum teleportation, two-qubit states, generalized Bell states, multipartite entanglement, entanglement measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review