The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiparty quantum secret sharing of classical messages based on entanglement swapping
Open accessAbstract
A multiparty quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocol of classical messages (i.e., classical bits) is proposed by using swapping quantum entanglement of Bell states. The secret messages are imposed on Bell states by local unitary operations. The secret messages are split into several parts, and each part is distributed to a separate party so that no action of a subset of all the parties without the cooperation of the entire group is able to read out the secret messages. In addition, dense coding is used in this protocol to achieve a high efficiency. The security of the present multiparty QSS against eavesdropping has been analyzed and confirmed even in a noisy quantum channel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Hillery, M., Bužek, V., & Berthiaume, A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1829 · Cited by 3,347
Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,460
‘‘Event-ready-detectors’’ Bell experiment via entanglement swapping
Żukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M. A., & Ekert, A. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.4287 · Cited by 2,045
Unconditional Security of Quantum Key Distribution over Arbitrarily Long Distances
Lo, H.-K., & Chau, H. F. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · Cited by 1,858
Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair block
Deng, F.-G., Long, G. L., & Liu, X.-S. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042317 · Cited by 1,771
Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme
Long, G. L., & Liu, X. S. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032302 · Cited by 1,741
Quantum Privacy Amplification and the Security of Quantum Cryptography over Noisy Channels
Deutsch, D., Ekert, A., Jozsa, R., Macchiavello, C., Popescu, S., & Sanpera, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2818 · Cited by 1,268
Cited by
Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against Trojan horse attack
Deng, F.-G., Li, X.-H., Zhou, H.-Y., & Zhang, Z.-J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.044302 · Cited by 578
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z.-J., & Man, Z.-X.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-08-04
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2013879965
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiparty quantum secret sharing of classical messages based on entanglement swapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.72.022303
- The paper
- Zhang, Z.-J., & Man, Z.-X. (2005). Multiparty quantum secret sharing of classical messages based on entanglement swapping. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.022303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
