The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against Trojan horse attack
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the security of the multiparty quantum secret sharing (MQSS) protocol recently proposed by Zhang, Li, and Man [Phys. Rev. A 71, 044301 (2005)] and found that this protocol is secure for any other eavesdropper except for the agent Bob who prepares the quantum signals as he can attack the quantum communication with a Trojan horse. That is, Bob replaces the single-photon signal with a multiphoton one and the other agent Charlie cannot find this cheating as she does not measure the photons before they run back from the boss Alice, which reveals that this MQSS protocol is not secure for Bob. Finally, we present a possible improvement of the MQSS protocol security with two single-photon measurements and four unitary operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
Hillery, M., Bužek, V., & Berthiaume, A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1829 · Cited by 3,347
Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication
Hwang, W.-Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.057901 · Cited by 1,807
Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair block
Deng, F.-G., Long, G. L., & Liu, X.-S. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042317 · Cited by 1,771
Self-citationTheoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme
Long, G. L., & Liu, X. S. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032302 · Cited by 1,741
Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.648 · Cited by 1,373
Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad
Deng, F.-G., & Long, G. L. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052319 · Cited by 1,219
Self-citationQuantum entanglement for secret sharing and secret splitting
Karlsson, A., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.162 · Cited by 1,020
Cited by
Yang, Y.-G., & Wen, Q.-Y. (2009) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/5/055305 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, F.-G., Li, X.-H., Zhou, H.-Y., & Zhang, Z.-J.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-10-18
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2065397263
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against Trojan horse attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.72.044302
- The paper
- Deng, F.-G., Li, X.-H., Zhou, H.-Y., & Zhang, Z.-J. (2005). Improving the security of multiparty quantum secret sharing against Trojan horse attack. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.044302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
