CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thresholds for linear optics quantum computing with photon loss at the detectors

Silva, Marcus, Rötteler, Martin, Zalka, Christof·2005·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.72.032307
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.72.032307

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the seven qubit CSS quantum code, the photon loss ǫ in the KLM scheme is allowed to be as large as 1.78% ≤ ǫ ≤ 11.5%, depending on the construction of the entangling gates.

    “Using the seven qubit CSS quantum code, the photon loss ǫ in the KLM scheme is allowed to be as large as 1.78% ≤ ǫ ≤ 11.5%, depending on the construction of the entangling gates (Silva et al. 2005).”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Silva et al. 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  3. M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052306 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/TASC.2003.814178 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1098 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1098/rspa.1996.0136 · DOI · Paper page
  9. P. Shor, 1996, 37th Symposium on Foundations of Computing
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052316 · DOI · Paper page
  11. J. Preskill, 1998, Introduction to Quantum Computation
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042322 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Silva, M., Rötteler, M., & Zalka, C.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2005-09-06
Volume
72
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.72.032307
Cited by
14
References
3
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review