Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms: A perspective from network complexity towards time complexity

Open access
Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Spörl, A., Khaneja, N., Glaser, S. J.·2005·Physical Review A

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate how optimal control methods can be used to speed up the implementation of modules of quantum algorithms or quantum simulations in networks of coupled qubits. The gain is most prominent in realistic cases, where the qubits are not all mutually coupled. Thus the shortest times obtained depend on the coupling topology as well as on the characteristic ratio of the time scales for local controls vs nonlocal (i.e., coupling) evolutions in the specific experimental setting. Relating these minimal times to the number of qubits gives the tightest known upper bounds to the actual time complexity of the quantum modules. As will be shown, time complexity is a more realistic measure of the experimental cost than the usual gate complexity. In the limit of fast local controls (as, e.g., in NMR), time-optimized realizations are shown for the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) and the multiply controlled NOT gate $({\mathrm{C}}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}\mathrm{NOT})$ in various coupling topologies of $n$ qubits. The speed-ups are substantial: in a chain of six qubits the quantum Fourier transform so far obtained by optimal control is more than eight times faster than the standard decomposition into controlled phase, Hadamard and SWAP gates, while the ${\mathrm{C}}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}\mathrm{NOT}$ gate for a completely coupled network of six qubits is nearly seven times faster.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.72.042331

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Spörl, A., Khaneja, N., & Glaser, S. J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2005-10-27
Volume
72
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2165501169
Cited by
158
References
7
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms: A perspective from network complexity towards time complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.72.042331
The paper
Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Spörl, A., Khaneja, N., & Glaser, S. J. (2005). Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms: A perspective from network complexity towards time complexity. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.042331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.