CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental fault-tolerant quantum cryptography in a decoherence-free subspace

Zhang, Qiang, Yin, Juan, Chen, Teng-Yun, Lu, Shan, Zhang, Jun, Li, Xiao-Qiang, Yang, Tao, Wang, Xiang-Bin, Pan, Jian-Wei·2006·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.73.020301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.73.020301

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum repeaters can be grouped in three main classes according to the technique adopted for correcting propagation errors.

    “In principle, QRs allow to improve the fidelity of transmission with QRs can be grouped in three main classes, according to the technique adopted for correcting propagation errors [401], as summarized schematically in Table 5.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [401]

    The passage on robust quantum communication (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) names quantum error-correction codes and decoherence-free subspaces, but does not discuss quantum repeaters. Searches for repeater classes and error-correction classifications found no passage supporting the claimed three-class grouping. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
  4. C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing
  5. 10.1126/science.1085593 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.150501 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.027901 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.217905 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.290.5491.498 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.147901 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.042307 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.017901 · DOI
  13. Z. D. Walton, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 087901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.087901 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.220501 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.050304 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/382780.382781 · DOI
  18. 10.1364/OPEX.13.009415 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Q., Yin, J., Chen, T.-Y., Lu, S., Zhang, J., Li, X.-Q., Yang, T., Wang, X.-B., & Pan, J.-W.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2006-02-08
Volume
73
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.73.020301
Cited by
31
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review