Cited by 180Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Connecting the discrete- and continuous-time quantum walks

Open access
Strauch, Frederick W.·2006·Physical Review A

Abstract

Recently, quantized versions of random walks have been explored as effective elements for quantum algorithms. In the simplest case of one dimension, the theory has remained divided into the discrete-time quantum walk and the continuous-time quantum walk. Though the properties of these two walks have shown similarities, it has remained an open problem to find the exact relation between the two. The precise connection of these two processes, both quantally and classically, is presented. Extension to higher dimensions is also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.74.030301

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difficulty to analyse the (3+1)-dimensional Dirac QW is mentioned in [14, 17-19].

    “The difficulty to analyse the + (3 1)-dimensional Dirac QW is mentioned in [14, 17-19].”

    From The Dirac equation as a quantum walk: higher dimensions, observational convergence (2014) · cites this paper as [17]

    On p. 4, Strauch says a calculation for a four-component quantum walk on a three-dimensional lattice breaks down because its operators do not commute. This supports a difficulty in analyzing a related higher-dimensional walk, but the passage concerns a particular continuous-time limit and does not identify the example as a (3+1)-dimensional Dirac quantum walk or claim that analyzing it generally is difficult. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and A. Rivosh, Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SIAM Press, Philadelphia, 2005), p. 1099.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strauch, F. W.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Strauch, Frederick W.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2006-09-07
Volume
74
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2147228721
Cited by
180
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
discrete-time quantum walks, continuous-time quantum walks, quantum walks, quantum algorithms, classical random walks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review