The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase-conjugate optical coherence tomography
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources.
“Indeed, the HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources, i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion [52,53], quantum dots [54][55][56][57][58], atomic vapours [59][60][61][62][63], nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond [64][65][66], trapped ions [67], trapped neutral atoms [68,69], and molecules [70,71].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1109/2944.796348 · DOI
- 10.1088/0034-4885/66/2/204 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.053817 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.083601 · DOI
- 10.1364/JOSAB.11.001130 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.504770 · DOI
- D. N. Klyshko, 1988, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 154, 133, 10.3367/UFNr.0154.198801e.0133 · DOI
- 10.1070/PU1988v031n01ABEH002537 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.8.000611 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.8.000569 · DOI
- 10.1119/1.16949 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Classical dispersion-cancellation interferometry
Resch, K. J., Puvanathasan, P., Lundeen, J. S., Mitchell, M. W., & Bizheva, K. (2007) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.15.008797 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Erkmen, B. I., & Shapiro, J. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-10-16
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
