Cited by 250Photonic Crystals and ApplicationsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsTopological Materials and Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extremal transmission at the Dirac point of a photonic band structure

Open access

Abstract

We calculate the effect of a Dirac point (a conical singularity in the band structure) on the transmission of monochromatic radiation through a photonic crystal. The transmission as a function of frequency has an extremum near the Dirac point, depending on the transparencies of the interfaces with free space. The extremal transmission ${T}_{0}={\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{0}W∕L$ is inversely proportional to the longitudinal dimension $L$ of the crystal (for $L$ larger than the lattice constant and smaller than the transverse dimension $W$). The interface transparencies affect the proportionality constant ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{0}$, and they determine whether the extremum is a minimum or a maximum, but they do not affect the ``pseudodiffusive'' $1∕L$ dependence of ${T}_{0}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.75.063813

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 249

Metadata

Authors
Sepkhanov, R. A., Bazaliy, Y. B., & Beenakker, C. W. J.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2007-06-13
Volume
75
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2088931175
Cited by
250
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
Keywords
Dirac point, photonic crystals, photonic band structure, transmission, conical singularities, interface transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review