Cited by 132Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Fast and robust approach to long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles

Open access
Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M., Lukin, M. D.·2007·Physical Review A

Abstract

Quantum repeaters create long-distance entanglement between quantum systems while overcoming difficulties such as the attenuation of single photons in a fiber. Recently, an implementation of a repeater protocol based on single qubits in atomic ensembles and linear optics has been proposed [Duan et al., Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001)]. Motivated by rapid experimental progress towards implementing that protocol, here we develop a more efficient scheme compatible with active purification of arbitrary errors. Using similar resources as the earlier protocol, our approach intrinsically purifies leakage out of the logical subspace and all errors within the logical subspace, leading to greatly improved performance in the presence of experimental inefficiencies. Our analysis indicates that our scheme could generate approximately one pair per $3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{min}$ over $1280\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}$ distance with fidelity $(F\ensuremath{\geqslant}78%)$ sufficient to violate Bell's inequality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.76.012301

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.

    “With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2007

  • A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007), Jiang et al., (2007), and Zhao et al., (2007).

    “A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007;Jiang et al., (2007); and Zhao et al., (2007).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M., & Lukin, M. D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2007-07-02
Volume
76
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2062851376
Cited by
132
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
19.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum repeaters, atomic ensembles, long-distance quantum communication, entanglement distillation, linear optics, Bell inequality violation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review