Fast and robust approach to long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles
Open accessAbstract
Quantum repeaters create long-distance entanglement between quantum systems while overcoming difficulties such as the attenuation of single photons in a fiber. Recently, an implementation of a repeater protocol based on single qubits in atomic ensembles and linear optics has been proposed [Duan et al., Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001)]. Motivated by rapid experimental progress towards implementing that protocol, here we develop a more efficient scheme compatible with active purification of arbitrary errors. Using similar resources as the earlier protocol, our approach intrinsically purifies leakage out of the logical subspace and all errors within the logical subspace, leading to greatly improved performance in the presence of experimental inefficiencies. Our analysis indicates that our scheme could generate approximately one pair per $3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{min}$ over $1280\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}$ distance with fidelity $(F\ensuremath{\geqslant}78%)$ sufficient to violate Bell's inequality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.
“With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2007
A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007), Jiang et al., (2007), and Zhao et al., (2007).
“A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007;Jiang et al., (2007); and Zhao et al., (2007).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2007
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880 · see citing works
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481 · see citing works
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023 · see citing works
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
“In this aspect, atomic-ensemble based schemes (Duan et al., 2001, 2002; Chen et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2007) are very promising.”
BackgroundQuantum repeaters based on single trapped ions
Sangouard, N., Dubessy, R., & Simon, C. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.042340 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M., & Lukin, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-07-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2062851376
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum repeaters, atomic ensembles, long-distance quantum communication, entanglement distillation, linear optics, Bell inequality violation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review