The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model
Open accessAbstract
We introduce schemes for quantum computing based on local measurements on entangled resource states. This work elaborates on the framework established in Gross and Eisert [Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220503 (2007); quant-ph/0609149]. Our method makes use of tools from many-body physics---matrix product states, finitely correlated states, or projected entangled pairs states---to show how measurements on entangled states can be viewed as processing quantum information. This work hence constitutes an instance where a quantum information problem---how to realize quantum computation---was approached using tools from many-body theory and not vice versa. We give a more detailed description of the setting and present a large number of examples. We find computational schemes, which differ from the original one-way computer, for example, in the way the randomness of measurement outcomes is handled. Also, schemes are presented where the logical qubits are no longer strictly localized on the resource state. Notably, we find a great flexibility in the properties of the universal resource states: They may, for example, exhibit nonvanishing long-range correlation functions or be locally arbitrarily close to a pure state. We discuss variants of Kitaev's toric code states as universal resources, and contrast this with situations where they can be efficiently classically simulated. This framework opens up a way of thinking of tailoring resource states to specific physical systems, such as cold atoms in optical lattices or linear optical systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“BQC uses the concept of one-way quantum computing [33-37], a measurement-based model of computation [38, 39] which represents a paradigm shift in the understanding of complex data processing by clearly separating the classical and quantum parts of a computation.”
From Demonstration of Blind Quantum Computing (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“in 19,85 it is shown how such universal resources for MQC-beyond the 2D-cluster states-can systematically be constructed.”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“The main conclusion of this investigation is that a number of extremal entanglement features (such as e.g. maximal localizable entanglement) exhibited by 2D-cluster states no longer have to be present in universal resources if only classical outputs are considered 19,85 .”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477
The density-matrix renormalization group
Schollwöck, U. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.259 · Cited by 3,323
Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations
Vidal, G. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 · Cited by 2,368
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655
Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains
Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., & Werner, R. F. (1992) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099178 · Cited by 1,422
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- R. Raussendorf, 2002, Quantum Inf. Comput., 6, 433
- 2005, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” on “Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos,”
- R. Jozsa, 2006, Quantum Information Proceedings
- I. Affleck, 1987, Commun. Math. Phys., 59, 799
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220601 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Gottesman, 1999, Proceedings of the XXII International Coll. Group Theor. Meth. Phys.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 · Cited by 2,873
Self-citationMeasurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090
Topological phases of fermions in one dimension
Fidkowski, L., & Kitaev, A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.075103 · Cited by 861
Demonstration of Blind Quantum Computing
Barz, S., Kashefi, E., Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J. F., Zeilinger, A., & Walther, P. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1214707 · Cited by 475
Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices
Bloch, I. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07126 · Cited by 389
Quantum computing with continuous-variable clusters
Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Menicucci, N. C., Ralph, T. C., & van Loock, P. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.062318 · Cited by 373
PEPS as ground states: Degeneracy and topology
Schuch, N., Cirac, J. I., & Pérez-García, D. (2010) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.05.008 · Cited by 333
Self-citationMost Quantum States Are Too Entangled To Be Useful As Computational Resources
Gross, D., Flammia, S. T., & Eisert, J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.190501 · Cited by 279
Self-citationSimulating Large Quantum Circuits on a Small Quantum Computer
Peng, T., Harrow, A. W., Ozols, M., & Wu, X. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.150504 · Cited by 324
Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation
Raussendorf, R. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.022322 · Cited by 248
A short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems
Latorre, J. I., & Riera, A. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504002 · Cited by 235
One-dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions
Verresen, R., Moessner, R., & Pollmann, F. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.165124 · Cited by 225
Blind quantum computation protocol in which Alice only makes measurements
Morimae, T., & Fujii, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.050301 · Cited by 179
Computational Power of Correlations
Anders, J., & Browne, D. E. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.050502 · Cited by 192
Tensor Network Contractions: Methods and Applications to Quantum Many-Body Systems
Ran, S.-J., Tirrito, E., Peng, C., Chen, X., Tagliacozzo, L., Su, G., & Lewenstein, M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34489-4 · Cited by 176
Symmetry-Protected Phases for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Else, D. V., Schwarz, I., Bartlett, S. D., & Doherty, A. C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.240505 · Cited by 182
Measurement-Based Quantum Computer in the Gapped Ground State of a Two-Body Hamiltonian
Brennen, G. K., & Miyake, A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010502 · Cited by 163
PEPS as ground states: Degeneracy and topology
Schuch, N., Pérez García, D., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 150
Self-citationEncoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates
Ran, S.-J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032310 · Cited by 171
Quantum Computation on the Edge of a Symmetry-Protected Topological Order
Miyake, A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.040501 · Cited by 127
Identifying Phases of Quantum Many-Body Systems That Are Universal for Quantum Computation
Doherty, A. C., & Bartlett, S. D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.020506 · Cited by 123
Are Random Pure States Useful for Quantum Computation?
Bremner, M. J., Mora, C. E., & Winter, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.190502 · Cited by 121
Quantum computational capability of a 2D valence bond solid phase
Miyake, A. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.03.006 · Cited by 108
Limitations of quantum computing with Gaussian cluster states
Ohliger, M., Kieling, K., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042336 · Cited by 97
Self-citationHierarchy of universal entanglement in 2D measurement-based quantum computation
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.36 · Cited by 88
Computational Power of Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases
Stephen, D. T., Wang, D., Prakash, A., Wei, T.-C., & Raussendorf, R. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.010504 · Cited by 86
Subsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter
Stephen, D. T., Nautrup, H. P., Bermejo-Vega, J., Eisert, J., & Raussendorf, R. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-05-20-142 · Cited by 82
Self-citationComputational Advantage from the Quantum Superposition of Multiple Temporal Orders of Photonic Gates
Taddei, M. M., Cariñe, J., Martínez, D., García, T., Guerrero, N., Abbott, A. A., Araújo, M., Branciard, C., Gómez, E. S., Walborn, S. P., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010320 · Cited by 79
Optical one-way quantum computing with a simulated valence-bond solid
Kaltenbaek, R., Lavoie, J., Zeng, B., Bartlett, S. D., & Resch, K. J. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1777 · Cited by 77
Universal quantum computation using fractal symmetry-protected cluster phases
Devakul, T., & Williamson, D. J. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022332 · Cited by 82
Subsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter
Stephen, D., Nautrup, H., Bermejo-Vega, J., Eisert, J., & Raussendorf, R. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 75
Self-citationCharacterizing symmetries in a projected entangled pair state
Pérez-Garcı́a, D., Sanz, M., González-Guillén, C. E., Wolf, M. M., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025010 · Cited by 75
Skrøvseth, S. O., & Bartlett, S. D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022316 · Cited by 75
Universal quantum computer from a quantum magnet
Cai, J., Miyake, A., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.052309 · Cited by 74
Smith, K. C., Crane, E., Wiebe, N., & Girvin, S. M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020315 · Cited by 78
Resource Quality of a Symmetry-Protected Topologically Ordered Phase for Quantum Computation
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.120506 · Cited by 66
Liquid Ground State, Gap, and Excited States of a Strongly Correlated Spin Chain
Lesanovsky, I. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.105301 · Cited by 66
Walter, M., Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch14 · Cited by 82
Self-citationQuantum Computational Renormalization in the Haldane Phase
Bartlett, S. D., Brennen, G. K., Miyake, A., & Renes, J. M. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.110502 · Cited by 63
Symmetry protection of measurement-based quantum computation in ground states
Else, D. V., Bartlett, S. D., & Doherty, A. C. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113016 · Cited by 63
Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation
Browne, D. E., Elliott, M. B., Flammia, S. T., Merkel, S. T., Miyake, A., & Short, A. J. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023010 · Cited by 55
Quantum Computation by Local Measurement
Raussendorf, R., & Wei, T.-C. (2011) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125041 · Cited by 63
Barz, S. (2015) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/48/8/083001 · Cited by 56
Measurement-based quantum computation in a two-dimensional phase of matter
Darmawan, A. S., Brennen, G. K., & Bartlett, S. D. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013023 · Cited by 51
Borla, U., Verresen, R., Shah, J., & Moroz, S. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.6.148 · Cited by 60
Wei, T.-C., Affleck, I. K., & Raussendorf, R. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032328 · Cited by 60
Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.040303 · Cited by 51
Self-citationQuantum measurement occurrence is undecidable
Eisert, J., Müller, M. P., & Gogolin, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.260501 · Cited by 50
Self-citationEfficient generation of universal two-dimensional cluster states with hybrid systems
Lin, Q., & He, B. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.022331 · Cited by 48
Simon, S. H. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198886723.001.0001 · Cited by 51
Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities
Hoban, M. J., Campbell, E. T., Loukopoulos, K., & Browne, D. E. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/023014 · Cited by 56
Daniel, A. K., Alexander, R. N., & Miyake, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-02-10-228 · Cited by 46
Quantum Computation in Correlation Space and Extremal Entanglement
Cai, J., Dür, W., den Nest, M. V., Miyake, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.050503 · Cited by 44
Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states
Garre-Rubio, J., Lootens, L., & Molnár, A. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-21-927 · Cited by 40
Gachechiladze, M., Gühne, O., & Miyake, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052304 · Cited by 35
Efficient measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable systems
Ohliger, M., & Eisert, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.062318 · Cited by 39
Self-citationDelocalized information in quantum networks
Miguel-Ramiro, J., & Dür, W. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab784d · Cited by 38
Universal measurement-based quantum computation with spin-2 Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki states
Wei, T.-C., & Raussendorf, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012310 · Cited by 38
Universal MBQC with generalised parity-phase interactions and Pauli measurements
Kissinger, A., & van de Wetering, J. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-04-26-134 · Cited by 36
Categorical Tensor Network States
Biamonte, J., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2011) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/1.3672009 · Cited by 37
Noninvertible Symmetry-Protected Topological Order in a Group-Based Cluster State
Fechisin, C., Tantivasadakarn, N., & Albert, V. V. (2025) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.011058 · Cited by 87
Symmetry-protected topologically ordered states for universal quantum computation
Nautrup, H. P., & Wei, T.-C. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.052309 · Cited by 39
Experimental Realization of a One-Way Quantum Computer Algorithm Solving Simon’s Problem
Tame, M., Bell, B. A., Franco, C. D., Wadsworth, W. J., & Rarity, J. G. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.200501 · Cited by 35
No-go theorem for one-way quantum computing on naturally occurring two-level systems
Chen, J., Chen, X., Duan, R., Ji, Z., & Zeng, B. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.050301 · Cited by 39
Vaucher, B., Nunnenkamp, A., & Jaksch, D. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023005 · Cited by 32
Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state
Molnár, A., Garre-Rubio, J., Pérez-García, D., Schuch, N., & Cirac, J. I. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae9fa · Cited by 31
Self-citationNormal projected entangled pair states generating the same state
Molnár, A., Garre-Rubio, J., Pérez-García, D., Schuch, N., & Cirac, J. I. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 31
Self-citationLatent Computational Complexity of Symmetry-Protected Topological Order with Fractional Symmetry
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.170503 · Cited by 30
ENTANGLEMENT IN VALENCE-BOND-SOLID STATES
Korepin, V. E., & XU, Y. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210055676 · Cited by 31
Flexible quantum circuits using scalable continuous-variable cluster states
Alexander, R. N., & Menicucci, N. C. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.062326 · Cited by 30
Browne, D., & Briegel, H. (2016) · Quantum Information · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch21 · Cited by 29
Bergholm, V., & Biamonte, J. (2011) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/24/245304 · Cited by 29
Generalized cluster states based on finite groups
Brell, C. G. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023029 · Cited by 35
Quantum spin models for measurement-based quantum computation
Wei, T.-C. (2018) · Advances in Physics X · doi:10.1080/23746149.2018.1461026 · Cited by 35
Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities
Hoban, M. J., Campbell, E. T., Loukopoulos, K., & Browne, D. E. (2011) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 29
Quantum State Reduction for Universal Measurement Based Computation
Chen, X., Duan, R., Ji, Z., & Zeng, B. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.020502 · Cited by 32
Hybrid valence-bond states for universal quantum computation
Wei, T.-C., Haghnegahdar, P., & Raussendorf, R. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.042333 · Cited by 31
Webster, M. A., Brown, B. J., & Bartlett, S. D. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-09-22-815 · Cited by 28
Fujii, K., & Morimae, T. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.010304 · Cited by 26
Experimental measurement-based quantum computing beyond the cluster-state model
Gao, W.-B., Yao, X.-C., Cai, J., Lu, H., Xu, P., Yang, T., Lu, C., Chen, Y.-A., Chen, Z., & Pan, J.-W. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.283 · Cited by 28
Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Wei, T.-C. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.013.31 · Cited by 46
Experimental characterization of universal one-way quantum computing
Bell, B. A., Tame, M., Clark, A. S., Nock, R. W., Wadsworth, W. J., & Rarity, J. G. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053030 · Cited by 28
Prakash, A., & Wei, T.-C. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022310 · Cited by 27
Strong entanglement causes low gate fidelity in inaccurate one-way quantum computation
Morimae, T. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.060307 · Cited by 25
Entanglement in valence-bond-solid states on symmetric graphs
Katsura, H., Kawashima, N., Kirillov, A. N., Korepin, V. E., & Tanaka, S. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/25/255303 · Cited by 29
Colladay, K. R., & Mueller, E. J. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad8dd · Cited by 24
Quantum information in the Posner model of quantum cognition
Halpern, N. Y., & Crosson, E. (2018) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.11.016 · Cited by 30
Lectures on Quantum Tensor NetworksPreprint
Biamonte, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.10049 · Cited by 34
Twisted Graph States for Ancilla-driven Universal Quantum Computation
Kashefi, E., Oi, D. K. L., Browne, D. E., Anders, J., & Andersson, E. (2009) · Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2009.07.096 · Cited by 24
Tensor network methods for invariant theory
Biamonte, J., Bergholm, V., & Lanzagorta, M. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/47/475301 · Cited by 23
Gour, G. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009560870.014 · Cited by 28
Transitions in the computational power of thermal states for measurement-based quantum computation
Barrett, S. D., Bartlett, S. D., Doherty, A. C., Jennings, D. H., & Rudolph, T. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.062328 · Cited by 22
Universal quantum computing using (Zd)3 symmetry-protected topologically ordered states
Chen, Y., Prakash, A., & Wei, T.-C. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.022305 · Cited by 24
Quantum computation by local measurementPreprint
Raussendorf, R., & Wei, T.-C. (2014) · Cited by 25
Compact Toffoli gate using weighted graph states
Tame, M., Özdemir, Ş. K., Koashi, M., Imoto, N., & Kim, M. S. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.020302 · Cited by 21
Graph states as ground states of two-body frustration-free Hamiltonians
Darmawan, A. S., & Bartlett, S. D. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/073013 · Cited by 21
Fermionic measurement-based quantum computation
Chiu, Y.-J., Chen, X., & Chuang, I. L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012305 · Cited by 21
Daniel, A. K., & Miyake, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.090505 · Cited by 21
Optical spin-1 chain and its use as a quantum-computational wire
Darmawan, A. S., & Bartlett, S. D. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.012328 · Cited by 18
Spin lattices with two-body Hamiltonians for which the ground state encodes a cluster state
Griffin, T., & Bartlett, S. D. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.062306 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, D., Eisert, J., Schuch, N., & Perez-Garcia, D.
- Affiliations
- London Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-11-19
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2077225059
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Library Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Microsoft Research
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- measurement-based quantum computation, one-way quantum computation, local measurements, matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, toric code, long-range correlations, classical simulation, ultracold atoms in optical lattices, linear optical systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
