Cited by 255Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Novel Schemes for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation

Open access
Gross, D., Eisert, J.·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We establish a framework which allows one to construct novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. The technique develops tools from many-body physics-based on finitely correlated or projected entangled pair states-to go beyond the cluster-state based one-way computer. We identify resource states radically different from the cluster state, in that they exhibit nonvanishing correlations, can be prepared using nonmaximally entangling gates, or have very different local entanglement properties. In the computational models, randomness is compensated in a different manner. It is shown that there exist resource states which are locally arbitrarily close to a pure state. We comment on the possibility of tailoring computational models to specific physical systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.220503

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extremal entanglement features such as maximal localizable entanglement exhibited by 2D-cluster states need not be present in universal resources if only classical outputs are considered.

    “The main conclusion of this investigation is that a number of extremal entanglement features (such as e.g. maximal localizable entanglement) exhibited by 2D-cluster states no longer have to be present in universal resources if only classical outputs are considered 19,85 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]

  • In measurement-based quantum computation, universal resources for reproducing classical outputs of any quantum computation can be systematically constructed beyond 2D-cluster states.

    “in 19,85 it is shown how such universal resources for MQC-beyond the 2D-cluster states-can systematically be constructed.”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gross, D., & Eisert, J.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-05-31
Volume
98
Issue
22
Pages
220503-220503
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2013793864
Cited by
255
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
measurement-based quantum computation, projected entangled pair states, resource states, cluster states, one-way quantum computation, local entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review