Cited by 56Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureTheoretical and Computational Physics

Simulation of time evolution with multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz

Open access
Rizzi, Matteo, Montangero, Simone, Vidal, Guifre·2008·Physical Review A

Abstract

We describe an algorithm to simulate time evolution using the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz and test it by studying a critical Ising chain with periodic boundary conditions and with up to $L\ensuremath{\approx}{10}^{6}$ quantum spins. The cost of a simulation, which scales as $L\text{ }{\text{log}}_{2}(L)$, is reduced to ${\text{log}}_{2}(L)$ when the system is invariant under translations. By simulating an evolution in imaginary time, we compute the ground state of the system. The errors in the ground-state energy display no evident dependence on the system size. The algorithm can be extended to lattice systems in higher spatial dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.77.052328

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unfavorable computational scaling O(χ^9) of time-dependent MERA makes a generalization to finite, higher dimensional disordered models impractical.

    “Although a time-dependent MERA algorithm has been proposed and successfully applied to translationally invariant 1D systems 90 , its unfavorable computational scaling O(χ 9 ) makes a generalization to our finite, higher dimensional disordered models impractical.”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1990).
  2. York) 16, 407 (1961).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizzi, M., Montangero, S., & Vidal, G.
Affiliations
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2008-05-22
Volume
77
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1538812421
Cited by
56
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz, time evolution simulation, quantum many-body systems, periodic boundary conditions, ground state energy, imaginary time evolution, translation invariance, computational cost scaling, quantum spin chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review