The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum phase estimation with lossy interferometers
Open accessAbstract
We give a detailed discussion of optimal quantum states for optical two-mode interferometry in the presence of photon losses. We derive analytical formulae for the precision of phase estimation obtainable using quantum states of light with a definite photon number and prove that maximization of the precision is a convex optimization problem. The corresponding optimal precision, i.e., the lowest possible uncertainty, is shown to beat the standard quantum limit thus outperforming classical interferometry. Furthermore, we discuss more general inputs: states with indefinite photon number and states with photons distributed between distinguishable time bins. We prove that neither of these is helpful in improving phase estimation precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the presence of decoherence, the optimal input states do not have an intuitive form and the maximization of the QFI (with rising N) becomes hard even numerically202930.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“From the point of view of metrology, the QFI is then bounded from above by the weighted sum of QFIs for each of these sectors30.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory
(1976) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering/Mathematics in science and engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)x6017-5 · Cited by 2,712
Theory of Statistical Estimation
Fisher, R. A. (1925) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100009580 · Cited by 2,684
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 314
Raffah, B. M., Berrada, K., Abdel‐Khalek, S., Khalil, E. M., Wahiddin, M. R., & Al‐Hadeethi, Y. (2020) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109784 · Cited by 4
Atomic quantum metrology with narrowband entangled and squeezed states of light
Wolfgramm, F. (2012) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-94721 · Cited by 7
Phase estimation of definite photon number states by using quantum circuits
Najafi, P., Naeimi, G., & Saeidian, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42516-0 · Cited by 5
Che, J., Zhang, Z., Hu, M., Shi, X., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.003054 · Cited by 4
Equivalence regimes for geometric quantum discord and local quantum uncertainty
Cordero, O., Villegas, A., Álvarez, J.-R., León‐Montiel, R. D. J., Passos, M. H. M., & Torres, J. P. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.042401 · Cited by 4
Yu, Z., Fang, B., Liu, P., Chen, S., Bao, G., Yuan, C.-H., & Chen, L. Q. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.453551 · Cited by 4
Quantum sensor network metrology with bright solitons
Tsarev, D. V., Osipov, S. G., Lee, R., Kulik, S. P., & Alodjants, A. P. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.062612 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Parameter Estimation Precision in a Dissipative Environment with Two‐Photon Driving
Xie, D., & Xu, C. (2020) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201900387 · Cited by 4
Precision protection through indirect correlations
Jin, Y. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.01.017 · Cited by 4
Jiang, K., Lee, H., Gerry, C. C., & Dowling, J. P. (2013) · The Rochester Conferences on Coherence and Quantum Optics and the Quantum Information and Measurement meeting · doi:10.1364/cqo.2013.m6.49 · Cited by 4
Super-resolving quantum LiDAR with even coherent states sources in the presence of loss and noise
Wang, Q., Hao, L., Tang, H., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Yang, X., Xu, L., & Zhao, Y. Z. (2016) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.08.033 · Cited by 4
Berrada, K. (2017) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2017.03.029 · Cited by 4
Optimal finite-dimensional probe states for quantum phase estimation
Qin, J.-F., Xu, Y., & Liu, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/953x-1rkm · Cited by 3
Quantum Sensing of Displacements with Stabilized Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States
Labarca, L., Turcotte, S., Blais, A., & Royer, B. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/qmss-lc5x · Cited by 3
Simultaneous optical phase and loss estimation revisited: measurement and probe incompatibility
Bezerra, M. E. O., Albarelli, F., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2025) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ade516 · Cited by 3
Error-corrected quantum sensing
Cappellaro, P., Layden, D., Jiang, L., Zhou, S., Zhang, M., & Preskill, J. P. (2019) · Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II · doi:10.1117/12.2511587 · Cited by 3
Optimal single-shot discrimination of optical modes
Primaatmaja, I. W., Ho, A., & Scarani, V. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052410 · Cited by 3
Bayesian minimum mean square error for transmissivity sensing
Zhou, B., Bash, B. A., Guha, S., & Gagatsos, C. N. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043033 · Cited by 5
Is it possible to recover Heisenberg limit by collecting information from memory environment
Jin, Y. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04140-9 · Cited by 3
Indefinite causal order for parameter estimation of channel with depolarization noise
Yuan, Y. (2024) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2024.130163 · Cited by 3
Persistent quantum advantage with definite photon-number states in lossy multiple-phase estimation
Namkung, M., Kim, D., Hong, S., Lee, C., & Lim, H. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/l44c-d76x · Cited by 3
Momenkhan, F. A., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2018) · Journal of Russian Laser Research · doi:10.1007/s10946-018-9711-7 · Cited by 3
Precision protection through cosmic string in quantum metrology
Jin, Y. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08776-0 · Cited by 3
Thermal quantum Fisher information in quantum dot system
Berrada, K. (2014) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2013.12.016 · Cited by 3
Two-mode Gaussian product states in a lossy interferometer
Jaseem, N., & Shaji, A. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1671-2 · Cited by 3
Precision enhancement in trapped ion rotation sensors
Li, G., Лю, Б., Xiao, X., & Wang, X. (2018) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aaeaea · Cited by 3
Jin, Y. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01728-x · Cited by 3
Algarni, A., Almarashi, A. M., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2018) · Journal of Russian Laser Research · doi:10.1007/s10946-018-9696-2 · Cited by 3
Experimental Advances in Phase Estimation with Photonic Quantum States
Knoll, L. T., Magnoni, A. G., & Larotonda, M. A. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27070712 · Cited by 5
Unified strategy for non-invertible Fisher information matrix in quantum metrology
Namkung, M., Lee, C., & Lim, H. (2025) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.131075 · Cited by 2
Maaroufi, A. E., Manan, A., Maroufi, B., Mohammed Daoud, A., & Haddadi, S. (2025) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.131231 · Cited by 2
The effects of symmetrical arrangement on quantum metrology
Jin, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00544-7 · Cited by 2
Nonclassical states of light in a nonlinear Michelson interferometer
Mathew, B. J., & Shaji, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062604 · Cited by 2
Ameliorated phase sensitivity through intensity measurements in a Mach–Zehnder interferometer
Ramakrishnan, J., & Ivan, J. S. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03376-7 · Cited by 2
Sub-shot-noise interferometry with two-mode quantum states
Marolleau, Q., Leprince, C., Gondret, V., Boiron, D., & Westbrook, C. I. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.023701 · Cited by 3
Alodjants, A. P., Tsarev, D. V., Kuts, D., Podoshvedov, S. A., & Kulik, S. P. (2024) · Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk · doi:10.3367/ufnr.2024.01.039634 · Cited by 2
Yao, W., Zhang, X., Tian, L., Liu, X., Shi, S., & Zheng, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032429 · Cited by 3
Efficient phase-sensitive compensation in lossy interferometry using optical amplification
Jiang, T., Zhao, J., Yao, F., Liang, X., Wu, Z., Huang, W., Wu, Y., & Chen, L. Q. (2025) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.554274 · Cited by 2
Bosonic entanglement and quantum sensing from energy transfer in two-tone Floquet systems
Chen, Y. J., Elben, A., Rubio, Á., & Refael, G. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/cm49-smhr · Cited by 2
Berrada, K. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1417-6 · Cited by 2
Feasible quantum engineering of quantum multiphoton superpositions
Stobińska, M. (2014) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2014.07.030 · Cited by 2
Practical implementation of mutually unbiased bases using quantum circuits
Seyfarth, U., Sánchez-Soto, L. L., & Leuchs, G. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.032102 · Cited by 2
Quantum measurements in spin-boson model under non-Markovian environment
Berrada, K., & Aldaghri, O. A. (2017) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2017.04.021 · Cited by 2
Dynamics of a Moving Two-Level Atom Under the Influence of Intrinsic Decoherence
Anwar, S. J., Sayyam, & Usman, M. (2018) · Journal of Russian Laser Research · doi:10.1007/s10946-018-9747-8 · Cited by 2
Heralded path-entangled NOON states generation from a reconfigurable photonic chip
Yu, X., Zhu, P., Wang, Y., Yu, M., Wu, C., Xue, S., Zheng, Q., Liu, Y., Wu, J., & Xu, P. (2021) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac3501 · Cited by 2
Quantum coherence and parameter estimation for mixed entangled coherent states
Algarni, M., Berrada, K., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2022) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732322501590 · Cited by 2
Phase Diffusion Mitigation in the Truncated Mach–Zehnder Interferometer
Liao, Q., Ma, H., Chen, L. Q., Zhang, W., & Yuan, C.-H. (2024) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym16020187 · Cited by 2
Cai, R.-J., Zhong, W., Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02867-3 · Cited by 2
Algarni, M., Berrada, K., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2023) · Journal of Russian Laser Research · doi:10.1007/s10946-023-10102-4 · Cited by 1
Quantum-like nonlinear interferometry with frequency-engineered classical light
Dalidet, R., Martin, A., Sauder, G., Labonté, L., & Tanzilli, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09533-7 · Cited by 1
Phase estimation in lossy optical interferometry without a reference beam
Tang, J., Wang, D., Zhong, W., Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2025) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ade6da · Cited by 1
Barrada, K. (2025) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms14110844 · Cited by 1
Virtual purification complements quantum error correction in quantum metrology
Kwon, H., Oh, C., Lim, Y., Jeong, H., Lee, S.-W., & Jiang, L. (2026) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01231-0 · Cited by 2
Multi-ion Mach—Zehnder interferometer with artificial nonlinear interactions
Hu, Y.-M., Yang, W., Xiao, X. M., Feng, M., & Li, C. (2014) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/23/3/034205 · Cited by 1
Sagnac effect enhancement with single-mode number squeezing in the presence of photon loss
Chen, K., Chen, S., Huang, S., & Yang, C. (2018) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-018-1325-3 · Cited by 1
Thermal Fisher information and entropy squeezing for superconducting qubits
Elqahtani, Z. M., Berrada, K., Abdel‐Khalek, S., & Eleuch, H. (2022) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105639 · Cited by 1
Quantum metrology with a non-linear kicked Mach–Zehnder interferometer
Müller, S., & Braun, D. (2022) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac82d4 · Cited by 1
Manufacturing the Future via Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems (DDDAS)
Çelik, N., Son, Y., & Runsewe, T. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_28 · Cited by 1
Individual versus simultaneous estimation of two parameters in a correlated noisy environment
Guo, Y.-N., Chen, X., Yang, C. F., & Xie, Q. (2023) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acfc7d · Cited by 1
Asymmetric entanglement for quantum target sensing
Lee, S., Kim, J., Kim, Z., & Kim, D. Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042429 · Cited by 1
Optimizing Parameter Estimation Precision in Open Quantum Systems
Berrada, K. (2025) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms14050368 · Cited by 1
Rai, A., Triggiani, D., Paolo Facchi, A., & Tamma, V. (2025) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06805-z · Cited by 1
Interplay of Fisher information flow and nonlocal correlation based on quantum state estimation
Abdel‐Khalek, S., Abd-Elmougod, G. A., & Asad, A. J. (2014) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-014-0099-5 · Cited by 1
Prefect Protection of Quantum-Enhanced Metrology from Dephasing Noise*
Zhong, W., Huang, Y., & Wang, X. (2017) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/67/4/383 · Cited by 1
Zheng, K., & Lijian, 张. Z. (2023) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop231285 · Cited by 1
Minimizing Decoherence in Optical Fiber for Long Distance Quantum Communication
Gupta, M. K. (2016) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.2314 · Cited by 1
MODELING LOSSY PROPAGATION OF NON-CLASSICAL LIGHT
Yurtsever, U. (2011) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749911006806
Enhanced resolution in lossy phase estimation by optical parametric amplification
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Toffoli, L., Martini, F. D., & Sciarrino, F. (2011) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.886457
Abdel-Rahman, E. O., Malki, Z., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2014) · Journal of Russian Laser Research · doi:10.1007/s10946-014-9466-8
QUANTUM INTERFEROMETRY AT ZERO AND FINITE TEMPERATURE WITH TWO-MODE BOSONIC JOSEPHSON JUNCTIONS
MAZZARELLA, G. (2012) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749912410080
Parameter estimation with and without using rotating-wave approximation
Berrada, K. (2016) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-016-0437-x
Phase sensitivity in deformed-state superposition considering nonlinear phase shifts
Berrada, K. (2016) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1054-660x/26/7/075201
Trapping phenomenon of the parameter estimation in asymptotic quantum states
Berrada, K. (2016) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1054-660x/26/9/095203
The Effect of Vacuum Fluctuations on Quantum Metrology for a Uniformly Accelerated Atom
Jin, Y. (2016) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-016-3232-3
Heralded NOON State Generation in Waveguide
Matthews, J. C. F. (2012) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32870-1_6
Theoretically exploring the phase precision in a noisy Mach-Zehnder interferometer
Xie, D., & Haifeng, C. (2017) · Journal of the Korean Physical Society · doi:10.3938/jkps.70.1016
Quantum Optical Metrology, Sensing and Imaging
Jiang, K. (2014) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.3138
Jin, Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2015-6
Quantum-Enhanced Magneto-optic Measurements in a Dissipative Medium
Okawa, Y., Morimoto, S., Yasutake, Y., & Fukatsu, S. (2019) · Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) · doi:10.1364/qim.2019.t5a.37
Precise Phase Measurements using an Entangled Coherent StatePreprint
Knott, P., & Dunningham, J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.3969
Optimization of Quantum Optical Metrology Systems
Studer, N. M. (2019) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.4842
Precision of Parameter Estimation in Quantum Metrology
You, C. (2019) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.4849
Quantum dynamics of measurements in terms of inter-qubit distances with a collective damping
Berrada, K. (2019) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2019.113726
Multi-parameter Optical Metrology: Quantum and Classical
Larson, W. D. (2020) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Beating Heisenberg limit with moving matter-wave solitons
Tsarev, D. V., Vinh, N. T., & Alodjants, A. P. (2020) · International Conference Laser Optics (ICLO) · doi:10.1109/iclo48556.2020.9285804
Na, D.-Y., & Chew, W. C. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications · doi:10.1109/cama49227.2021.9703461
Influence of multiphoton events on the quantum enhanced phase estimation
Zhang, M., Huang, L., Liu, Y., Zhao, W., & Wang, W. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.468727
Anwar, S. J., Ramzan, M. A., & Khan, M. (2023) · Atoms · doi:10.3390/atoms11030042
Optical parameter sensing: sensitivity limits and the advantages of using spatial modes of light
Villegas, A. (2023) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-398830
Multiparameter Quantum Metrology with Bright Solitons
Alodjants, A. P., Tsarev, D. V., Osipov, S. G., Podoshvedov, M. S., & Kulik, S. P. (2024) · Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences Physics · doi:10.1134/s1062873824706676
Li, J., Feng, X. N., He, D., Hu, W. Y., Song, H., & Wei, L. F. (2024) · Optics Continuum · doi:10.1364/optcon.524553
Multiparameter quantum metrology with bright solitons
Alodjants, A. P., Tsarev, D. V., Osipov, S. G., Podoshvedov, M. S., & Kulik, S. P. (2024) · Известия Российской академии наук Серия физическая · doi:10.31857/s0367676524060022
Two-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel-based sensor with N -fold maximal precision
Li, Q., Sun, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.022607
Abdel‐Khalek, S., Algarni, M., & Berrada, K. (2025) · Open Physics · doi:10.1515/phys-2025-0163
Superresolution of unequal-brightness thermal sources for stellar interferometry
Hu, C. W., Wang, B., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Liu, H.-G., Zhou, J., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/z157-q6n3
Risk-minimizing states for the quantum-phase-estimation algorithm
Smith, J. G., Barnes, C. H. W., & Arvidsson-Shukur, D. R. M. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/8n2r-mxlc · Cited by 2
Improved quantum sensing by spectral design
Aigner, P., & Dür, W. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae0fbd
Measurement compatibility in multiparameter quantum interferometry
Jayakumar, J., Barbieri, M., & Stobińska, M. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/m8l6-8nct
Wenfeng, 黄. H., Jie, 赵. Z., Zeliang, 武. W., Chunhua, 袁. Y., & Liqing, 陈. C. (2025) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos251404 · Cited by 1
Phase Sensitivity of Lossy Mach–Zehnder Interferometer via Photon Addition Operation
Zhou, Q., Kang, Q., Zhao, T., Su, X., Liu, C., & Hu, L. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500881
Metadata
- Authors
- Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, R., Dorner, U., Smith, B. J., Lundeen, J. S., Wasilewski, W., Banaszek, K., & Walmsley, I. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-07-24
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1987408033
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E036066/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- quantum phase estimation, optical interferometry, photon loss, photon number states, convex optimization, standard quantum limit, time-bin entanglement, precision measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
