Cited by 218Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Scaling laws for precision in quantum interferometry and the bifurcation landscape of the optimal state

Open access
Knysh, Sergey, Smelyanskiy, Vadim N., Durkin, Gabriel A.·2011·Physical Review A

Abstract

Phase precision in optimal two-channel quantum interferometry is studied in the limit of large photon number $N\ensuremath{\gg}1$, for losses occurring in either one or both channels. For losses in one channel an optimal state undergoes an intriguing sequence of local bifurcations as the number of photons (or losses) increase. The optimal state has a continuous form in the Fock state basis for large $N$. The loss parameter limits any precision improvement over classical light to at most a constant factor independent of $N$. We determine a crossover value of photon number ${N}_{c}$ beyond which supraclassical precision is progressively lost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.83.021804

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CE method yields an optimal bound for the lossy interferometer, listed in Table 1, which is asymptotically equally tight to the best bounds known in the literature.

    “The optimal bound (see Table 1) corresponds to h with non-zero elements . This bound is asymptotically equally tight to the best bounds known in the literature383940, proving again that CE method despite its simplicity is able to provide powerful results in a straightforward manner.”

    From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [39]

  • For particular decoherence models, prior work rigorously showed that asymptotically with respect to N, even infinitesimally small noise turns Heisenberg scaling into standard scaling, so the quantum gain amounts to a constant factor improvement.

    “Unfortunately, both the theory29303132333435 and experiments3637 confirmed the fragility of the above schemes when noise sources such as decoherence are considered, and it has been rigorously shown for particular models that asymptotically with respect to N, even infinitesimally small noise turns HS into SS, so that the quantum gain amounts to a constant factor improvement383940.”

    From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knysh, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Durkin, G. A.
Affiliations
Ames Research Center (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2011-02-25
Volume
83
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1990463130
Cited by
218
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
quantum interferometry, scaling laws, optical loss, bifurcation, ideal state, Fock states, quantum-to-classical transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review