Scaling laws for precision in quantum interferometry and the bifurcation landscape of the optimal state
Open accessAbstract
Phase precision in optimal two-channel quantum interferometry is studied in the limit of large photon number $N\ensuremath{\gg}1$, for losses occurring in either one or both channels. For losses in one channel an optimal state undergoes an intriguing sequence of local bifurcations as the number of photons (or losses) increase. The optimal state has a continuous form in the Fock state basis for large $N$. The loss parameter limits any precision improvement over classical light to at most a constant factor independent of $N$. We determine a crossover value of photon number ${N}_{c}$ beyond which supraclassical precision is progressively lost.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CE method yields an optimal bound for the lossy interferometer, listed in Table 1, which is asymptotically equally tight to the best bounds known in the literature.
“The optimal bound (see Table 1) corresponds to h with non-zero elements . This bound is asymptotically equally tight to the best bounds known in the literature383940, proving again that CE method despite its simplicity is able to provide powerful results in a straightforward manner.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [39]
For particular decoherence models, prior work rigorously showed that asymptotically with respect to N, even infinitesimally small noise turns Heisenberg scaling into standard scaling, so the quantum gain amounts to a constant factor improvement.
“Unfortunately, both the theory29303132333435 and experiments3637 confirmed the fragility of the above schemes when noise sources such as decoherence are considered, and it has been rigorously shown for particular models that asymptotically with respect to N, even infinitesimally small noise turns HS into SS, so that the quantum gain amounts to a constant factor improvement383940.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202 · see citing works
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176 · see citing works
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,014 · see citing works
Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states
Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510802091298 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the Heisenberg limit
Holland, M., & Burnett, K. R. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1355 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Optimal Quantum Phase Estimation
Dorner, U., Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, R., Smith, B. J., Lundeen, J. S., Wasilewski, W., Banaszek, K., & Walmsley, I. A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.040403 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Quantum phase estimation with lossy interferometers
Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, R., Dorner, U., Smith, B. J., Lundeen, J. S., Wasilewski, W., Banaszek, K., & Walmsley, I. A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.013825 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Creation of large-photon-number path entanglement conditioned on photodetection
Kok, P., Lee, H., & Dowling, J. P. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.052104 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Entangled Fock states for robust quantum optical metrology, imaging, and sensing
Huver, S. D., Wildfeuer, C. F., & Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.063828 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Phase estimation without<i>a priori</i>phase knowledge in the presence of loss
Kołodyński, J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.053804 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Optimization of quantum interferometric metrological sensors in the presence of photon loss
Lee, T., Huver, S. D., Lee, H., Kaplan, L., McCracken, S. B., Min, C., Uskov, D. B., Wildfeuer, C. F., Veronis, G., & Dowling, J. P. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.063803 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Phase estimation for thermal Gaussian states
Aspachs, M., Calsamiglia, J., Muñoz-Tapia, R., & Bagán, E. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.033834 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Parameter Estimation with Entangled Photons Produced by Parametric Down-Conversion
Cable, H. V., & Durkin, G. A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.013603 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationThe entanglement and phase measurement performance of the damped NOON state
Chen, X., & Jiang, L.-Z. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/14/001 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Brif, C. (1999) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00714-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894 · see citing works
General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology
Escher, B. M., de Matos Filho, R. L., & Davidovich, L. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1958 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
Tóth, G., & Apellaniz, I. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation
Liu, J., Yuan, H., Lu, X.-M., & Wang, X. (2020) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab5d4d · Cited by 802 · see citing works
The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Kołodyński, J., & Guţă, M. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2067 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
Tóth, G., & Apellaniz, I. (2014) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 672 · see citing works
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Quantum Limits in Optical Interferometry
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Jarzyna, M., & Kołodyński, J. (2015) · Progress in optics · doi:10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Quantum metrology and its application in biology
Taylor, M. A., & Bowen, W. P. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.002 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Polino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007577 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Using Entanglement Against Noise in Quantum Metrology
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Maccone, L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.250801 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements
D’Ambrosio, V., Spagnolo, N., Re, L. D., Slussarenko, S., Li, Y., Kwek, L. C., Marrucci, L., Walborn, S. P., Aolita, L., & Sciarrino, F. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3432 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network
Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Borregaard, J., Izumi, S., Larsen, M. V., Gehring, T., Christandl, M., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S., & Andersen, U. L. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0743-x · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology
Ragy, S., Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052108 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown optical phase
Xiang, G., Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.268 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Geometric perspective on quantum parameter estimation
Sidhu, J. S., & Kok, P. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/1.5119961 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Optical Phase Estimation in the Presence of Phase Diffusion
Genoni, M. G., Olivares, S., & Paris, M. G. A. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.153603 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information of entangled coherent states in the presence of photon loss
Zhang, Y. M., Li, X., Yang, W., & Jin, G. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.043832 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Noisy Metrology beyond the Standard Quantum Limit
Chaves, R., Brask, J. B., Markiewicz, M., Kołodyński, J., & Acín, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.120401 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Quantum interferometry with and without an external phase reference
Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.011801 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Quantum Optical Technologies for Metrology, Sensing, and Imaging
Dowling, J. P., & Seshadreesan, K. P. (2014) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2014.2386795 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Optimal quantum-enhanced interferometry using a laser power source
Lang, M. D., & Caves, C. M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.173601 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Ultimate Precision Limits for Noisy Frequency Estimation
Smirne, A., Kołodyński, J., Huelga, S. F., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.120801 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Efficient tools for quantum metrology with uncorrelated noise
Kołodyński, J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073043 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Adaptive Quantum Metrology under General Markovian Noise
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Czajkowski, J., & Sekatski, P. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.041009 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with full and fast quantum control
Sekatski, P., Skotiniotis, M., Kołodyński, J., & Dür, W. (2017) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2017-09-06-27 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
True precision limits in quantum metrology
Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013010 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Tradeoff in simultaneous quantum-limited phase and loss estimation in interferometry
Crowley, P. J. D., Datta, A., Barbieri, M., & Walmsley, I. A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023845 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Banaszek, K., & Schnabel, R. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.041802 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with imperfect states and detectors
Datta, A., Zhang, L., Thomas-Peter, N. L., Dorner, U., Smith, B. J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.063836 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information as a signature of the superradiant quantum phase transition
Wang, T.-L., Wu, L.-N., Yang, W., Jin, G.-R., Lambert, N., & Nori, F. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063039 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Quantum parameter estimation with optimal control
Liu, J., & Yuan, H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012117 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Optimal Feedback Scheme and Universal Time Scaling for Hamiltonian Parameter Estimation
Yuan, H., & Fung, C. F. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.110401 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Barbieri, M. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010202 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with open dynamical systems
Tsang, M. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073005 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with entangled spin-coherent states of two modes
Berrada, K., Abdel‐Khalek, S., & Ooi, C. H. R. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.033823 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information in noninertial frames
Yao, Y., Xiao, X. M., Ge, L., Wang, X., & Sun, C.-P. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042336 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information as a signature of the superradiant quantum phase transition
Wang, T.-L., Wu, L.-N., Yang, W., Jin, G.-R., Lambert, N., & Nori, F. (2014) · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Enhancing teleportation of quantum Fisher information by partial measurements
Xiao, X. M., Yao, Y., Zhong, W.-J., Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.012307 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Control-enhanced multiparameter quantum estimation
Liu, J., & Yuan, H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.042114 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Towards practical quantum metrology with photon counting
Matthews, J. C. F., Zhou, X., Cable, H. V., Shadbolt, P., Saunders, D. J., Durkin, G. A., Pryde, G. J., & O’Brien, J. L. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.23 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationBayesian quantum frequency estimation in presence of collective dephasing
Macieszczak, K., Fraas, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113002 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Quantum limits on postselected, probabilistic quantum metrology
Combes, J., Ferrie, C., Zhang, J., & Caves, C. M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.052117 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Does Nonlinear Metrology Offer Improved Resolution? Answers from Quantum Information Theory
Hall, M. J. W., & Wiseman, H. M. (2012) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.2.041006 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems
Montenegro, V., Mukhopadhyay, C., Yousefjani, R., Sarkar, S., Mishra, U., Paris, M. G. A., & Bayat, A. (2025) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.05.005 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Experimental phase estimation enhanced by machine learning
Lumino, A., Polino, E., Rab, A. S., Milani, G., Spagnolo, N., Wiebe, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.044033 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Dynamical decoupling leads to improved scaling in noisy quantum metrology
Sekatski, P., Skotiniotis, M., & Dür, W. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/073034 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Quantum Metrology for Noisy Systems
Escher, B. M., de Matos Filho, R. L., & Davidovich, L. (2011) · Brazilian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1007/s13538-011-0037-y · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Quantum Bell–Ziv–Zakai bounds and Heisenberg limits for waveform estimation
Berry, D. W., Tsang, M., Hall, M. J. W., & Wiseman, H. M. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.031018 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Optimal Scheme for Quantum Metrology
Liu, J., Mao, Z., Chen, H., Wang, L., & Yuan, H. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100080 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Optical interferometry in the presence of large phase diffusion
Genoni, M. G., Olivares, S., Brivio, D., Cialdi, S., Cipriani, D., Santamato, A., Vezzoli, S., & Paris, M. G. A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.043817 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Experimental optical phase measurement approaching the exact Heisenberg limit
Daryanoosh, S., Slussarenko, S., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06601-7 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with SU(1,1) coherent states in the presence of nonlinear phase shifts
Berrada, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.013817 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Li, Y., Xiao, X. M., & Yao, Y. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052105 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Multiparameter approach to quantum phase estimation with limited visibility
Roccia, E., Cimini, V., Sbroscia, M., Gianani, I., Ruggiero, L., Mancino, L., Genoni, M. G., Ricci, M. A., & Barbieri, M. (2018) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.5.001171 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Sahota, J., & Quesada, N. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.013808 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Manceau, M., Khalili, F. Y., & Chekhova, M. V. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa53d1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Quantum parameter estimation with general dynamics
Yuan, H., & Fung, C. F. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0014-6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The parity operator: Applications in quantum metrology
Birrittella, R. J., Alsing, P. M., & Gerry, C. C. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0026148 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Quantum metrology with one-dimensional superradiant photonic states
Paulisch, V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., González-Tudela, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.043807 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Quantum transition-edge detectors
Tsang, M. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.021801 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Enhanced interferometry using squeezed thermal states and even or odd states
Tan, Q.-S., Liao, J., Wang, X., & Nori, F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.053822 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Quantum metrology for the Ising Hamiltonian with transverse magnetic field
Skotiniotis, M., Sekatski, P., & Dür, W. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073032 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Bounds to precision for quantum interferometry with Gaussian states and operations
Sparaciari, C., Olivares, S., & Paris, M. G. A. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.001354 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Entangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits
Roccia, E., Gianani, I., Mancino, L., Sbroscia, M., Somma, F., Genoni, M. G., & Barbieri, M. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9212 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Squeezing-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Michael, Y., Bello, L., Rosenbluh, M., & Pe’er, A. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0197-0 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Geometric perspective on quantum parameter estimation
Sidhu, J. S., & Kok, P. (2020) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Jiang, K., Lee, H., Gerry, C. C., & Dowling, J. P. (2013) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4829016 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
QuanEstimation: An open-source toolkit for quantum parameter estimation
Mao, Z., Yu, H.-M., Yuan, H., Wang, X., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Liu, J. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043057 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fidelity and Fisher information on quantum channels
Yuan, H., & Fung, C. F. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa874c · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Phase Estimation via Quantum Interferometry for Noisy Detectors
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Lucivero, V. G., Giovannetti, V., Maccone, L., & Sciarrino, F. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.233602 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Chang, S., Ye, W., Zhang, H., Hu, L., Huang, J., & Liu, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.033704 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Matrix Product States for Quantum Metrology
Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.240405 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Multiple phase estimation for arbitrary pure states under white noise
Yao, Y., Ge, L., Xiao, X., Wang, X., & Sun, C. P. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.062113 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Parameter estimation using NOON states over a relativistic quantum channel
Hosler, D., & Kok, P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052112 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Intuitive reason for the usefulness of entanglement in quantum metrology
Maccone, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042109 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Quantum phase estimation using a multi-headed cat state
Lee, S., Lee, C.-W., Nha, H., & Kaszlikowski, D. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.001186 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Quantum parameter estimation affected by unitary disturbance
Pasquale, A. D., Rossini, D., Paolo Facchi, A., & Giovannetti, V. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052117 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Heisenberg scaling with weak measurement: a quantum state discrimination point of view
Jordan, A. N., Tollaksen, J., Troupe, J. E., Dressel, J., & Aharonov, Y. (2015) · Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-015-0036-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Quantum phase estimation using path-symmetric entangled states
Lee, S., Lee, C.-W., Lee, J., & Nha, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30306 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Mode engineering for realistic quantum-enhanced interferometry
Jachura, M., Chrapkiewicz, R., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Wasilewski, W., & Banaszek, K. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11411 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bayesian quantum frequency estimation in presence of collective dephasing
Macieszczak, K., Fraas, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2014) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000096898 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Weak measurements and the joint estimation of phase and phase diffusion
Altorio, M., Genoni, M. G., Vidrighin, M. D., Somma, F., & Barbieri, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032114 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Chabuda, K., Leroux, I. D., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083035 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Maccone, L., & Giovannetti, V. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1976 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Quantum Limit for Laser Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detectors from Optical Dissipation
Miao, H., Smith, N. D., & Evans, M. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.011053 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Electromagnetic shielding in quantum metrology
Jin, Y., & Yu, H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022120 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Yuan, H., & Fung, C. F. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012310 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Perarnau-Llobet, M., González-Tudela, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab6ce5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Robust Quantum Enhanced Phase Estimation in a Multimode Interferometer
Cooper, J. J., Hallwood, D. W., Dunningham, J., & Brand, J. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.130402 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Experimental optical phase measurement approaching the exact Heisenberg limit
Daryanoosh, S., Slussarenko, S., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ferrie, C. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/093035 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Perarnau-Llobet, M., González-Tudela, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2020) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Precision bounds in noisy quantum metrologyPreprint
Kołodyński, J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0535 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Metrology with Unknown Detectors
Altorio, M., Genoni, M. G., Somma, F., & Barbieri, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.100802 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Wang, Q., Hao, L., Zhang, Y. A., Xu, L., Yang, C., Yang, X., & Zhao, Y. Z. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.005045 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Quantum computation speedup limits from quantum metrological precision bounds
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Markiewicz, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.062322 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Suppressing the information losses of accelerated qubit–qutrit system
Abd‐Rabbou, M. Y., METWALLY, N., Ahmed, M. M. A., & Obada, A. ‐. F. (2019) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749919500321 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Modified Grover operator for quantum amplitude estimation
Uno, S., Suzuki, Y., Hisanaga, K., Raymond, R., Tanaka, T., Onodera, T., & Yamamoto, N. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac19da · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Non-classical states of atomic ensembles: fundamentals and applications in quantum metrologyPreprint
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R., & Treutlein, P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Knysh, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Durkin, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-02-25
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1990463130
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- quantum interferometry, scaling laws, optical loss, bifurcation, ideal state, Fock states, quantum-to-classical transition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review