The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arbitrarily complete Bell-state measurement using only linear optical elements
Abstract
A complete Bell-state measurement is not possible using only linear-optic elements, and most schemes achieve a success rate of no more than 50%, distinguishing, for example, two of the four Bell states but returning degenerate results for the other two. It is shown here that the introduction of a pair of ancillary entangled photons improves the success rate to 75%. More generally, the addition of ${2}^{N}\ensuremath{-}2$ ancillary photons yields a linear-optic Bell-state measurement with a success rate of $1\ensuremath{-}1/{2}^{N}$.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In MDI QKD implementations, attenuated laser pulses with the decoy state protocol were employed to achieve high secret key rates.
“In the aforementioned implementations of MDI QKD, to achieve high secret key rates, attenuated laser pulses were employed along with the decoy state protocol [101].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
‘‘Event-ready-detectors’’ Bell experiment via entanglement swapping
Żukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M. A., & Ekert, A. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.4287 · Cited by 2,045
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.R2623 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.080403 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on quantum computing technology
Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002 · Cited by 646
Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing
Rudolph, T. (2017) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.4976737 · Cited by 350
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Grice, W. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-10-19
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
