Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Error tolerance of the boson-sampling model for linear optics quantum computing

Rohde, Peter P., Ralph, Timothy C.·2012·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.85.022332

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, the implementation of a lossy BosonSampling experiment has been reported.

    “Recently the implementation of a lossy BosonSampling experiment has been reported [595]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [595]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
  2. P. Kok, 2010, Introduction to Optical Quantum Information Processing, 10.1017/CBO9781139193658 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.207903 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.097904 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/18.761271 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2226 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030503 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/091 · DOI · Paper page
  10. D. Aharonov, 2001, STOC '01: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
  11. 10.1080/00107151031000110776 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rohde, P. P., & Ralph, T. C.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
85
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
69
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review