Cited by 13Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography

Open access
Kalev, Amir, Shang, Jiangwei, Englert, Berthold-Georg·2012·Physical Review A

Abstract

We propose an experiment that realizes a symmetric informationally complete (SIC) probability-operator measurement (POM) in the four-dimensional Hilbert space of a qubit pair. The qubit pair is carried by a single photon as a polarization qubit and a path qubit. The implementation of the SIC POM is accomplished with the means of linear optics. The experimental scheme exploits an approach to SIC POMs that uses a two-step process: a measurement with full-rank outcomes, followed by a projective measurement on a basis that is chosen in accordance with the result of the first measurement. The basis of the first measurement and the four bases of the second measurements are pairwise unbiased---a hint at a possibly profound link between SIC POMs and mutually unbiased bases.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes a linear-optics experiment to realize a symmetric informationally complete (SIC) probability-operator measurement (POM) for a two-qubit system encoded in a single photon’s polarization and path. It uses a two-step measurement scheme whose second bases are mutually unbiased with the first, suggesting a structural link between SIC POMs and mutually unbiased bases.

Key findings

The proposal implements the four-dimensional SIC POM as two successive measurements with \(d=4\) outcomes each, yielding \(d^2=16\) overall outcomes \(P_{n,m}=A_n^\dagger B_m^{(n)}A_n\). The first measurement is a POM diagonal in the computational basis with Kraus operators \(A_k\), and the second is a projective measurement in one of four mutually unbiased bases \(B_k\), chosen according to the first outcome. The paper reports that the SIC POM for the qubit pair corresponds to this construction and that the fiducial vectors in dimension 4 have a structural relation to the MUB vectors. Specific optical parameters are given, including \(N=\sqrt{5+\sqrt5}\), \(\chi=\sqrt{2+\sqrt5}\), beam-splitter reflection coefficients \(r_1=1/N\), \(r_2=1/\sqrt{N^2-1}\), and PPBS amplitude coefficient \(y=1/\sqrt{N^2-2}\).

Methods

The work is a theoretical experimental proposal, not an experiment; it designs an optical implementation using passive linear elements: half-wave plates, beam splitters, phase shifters, partially polarizing beam splitters, polarizing beam splitters, and photodetectors. The two qubits are encoded in a single photon as a polarization qubit (vertical/horizontal) and a path qubit (left/right). The first measurement is realized by beam splitters and PPBSs configured to implement the Kraus operators \(A_k\); the second measurement applies a unitary \(U_k\) that transforms basis \(B_k\) into the computational basis, followed by PBSs and photodetectors. The paper analyzes the SIC POM construction in \(d=4\), identifies the \(A\)s as Kraus operators, and shows the operations transform the computational basis into the MUB.

Limitations

The paper states that practical implementation of the qubit scheme in Fig. 1 requires stabilization of the interferometer loop defined by four beam splitters, and that for the two-qubit proposal the unitaries \(U_3\) and \(U_4\) require PPBSs together with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. It also states that there is no systematic procedure for implementing SIC POMs in higher dimensions in a simple experimental setup, and that generalizing this scheme to higher dimensions is left as an open question. Evident from the text: this is a proposal only, with no experimental data, error analysis, or demonstrated implementation reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.85.052115

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 8 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 1

    All experiments and proposals for experiments implementing SIC POMs up to date have been limited to the two-level system (qubit), with the exception of one where a SIC POM for a three-level system was approximated.

    “In contrast to the major theoretical progress, up to date, all experiments and even proposals for experiments implementing SIC POMs have been limited to the very basic quantum system, the two-level system (qubit) [10, 11], with the exception of [12] where a SIC POM for a three-level system was approximated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] source
    • cites [11] W.M. Pimenta, B. Marques, M.A. Carvalho, M.R. Barros, J.G. Fonseca, J. Ferraz, M. Terra Cunha, and S. P´ adua, Opt. Express 18 , 24423 (2010). source
    • cites [12] Z.E.D. Medendorp, F.A. Torres-Ruiz, L.K. Shalm, G.N.M. Tabia, C.A. Fuchs, and A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. A 83 , 051801(R) (2011). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 1

    The qubit pair is carried by a single photon as a polarization qubit and a path qubit.

    “The qubit pair is carried by a single photon as a polarization qubit and a path qubit.”
    • Also stated in: § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 3 · plain
      “Our proposal is based on the methods of [15] where the two qubits, a polarization qubit and a path qubit, are encoded in a single photon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] B.-G. Englert, C. Kurtsiefer, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A 63 , 032303 (2001). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 2

    The SIC POM in dimension 4 is composed of 16 subnormalized projectors onto 16 fiducial kets.

    “This SIC POM is composed of 16 subnormalized projectors onto 16 (fiducial) kets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] I. Bengtsson, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 254 , 012007 (2010). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 1

    The experimental scheme uses a two-step process that breaks the SIC POM into two successive measurements, each with d outcomes: a measurement with full-rank outcomes, followed by a projective measurement on a basis chosen in accordance with the result of the first measurement.

    “The experimental scheme exploits a new approach to SIC POMs that uses a two-step process: a measurement with full-rank outcomes, followed by a projective measurement on a basis that is chosen in accordance with the result of the first measurement.”
    • Also stated in: § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 1 · hedged
      “In this approach, we 'break' the SIC POM into two successive measurements, each with d outcomes, with the intention that each measurement would be relatively easy to implement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 1

    The proposal exploits a new theoretical approach for constructing SIC POMs.

    “The proposal exploits a new theoretical approach for constructing SIC POMs [13].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 2

    In dimension 4, there is only one known SIC POM, and all other known SIC POMs are unitarily equivalent to it.

    “In dimension 4, there is only one known SIC POM, and all the other known SIC POMs are unitarily equivalent to it [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 3

    The bases B1 and B2 are composed of product states, while the bases B3 and B4 consist of maximally entangled states.

    “The bases B 1 and B 2 are composed of product states, while the bases B 3 and B 4 consist of maximally entangled states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 2

    The set of bases corresponding to each unitary matrix, together with the computational basis, form the complete set of MUB in dimension 4.

    “The set of bases, corresponding to each unitary matrix, together with the computational basis, form the complete set of MUB in dimension 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 4

    The unitary transformations U3 and U4 are not of that kind and could be realized by using PPBSs together with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer.

    “The unitary transformation U 3 and U 4 are not of that kind and could be realized, for example, by using PPBSs together with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Experimental proposal for symmetric minimal two-qubit state tomography · p. 4

    This unique construction is owed to a structural relation between the fiducial vectors and the MUB vectors in dimension 4.

    “We observed that this unique construction is owed to a structural relation between the fiducial vectors and the MUB vectors in dimension 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The same unitaries are assigned opposite basis transformations

    Minor

    The paper says the operations of Eq. (3) transform the computational basis into the mutually unbiased bases. The measurement instructions instead apply those same operations to transform those bases into the computational basis; that step would generally require the inverse unitaries.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalev, A., Shang, J., & Englert, B.-G.
Affiliations
Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
85
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2011594711
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
symmetric informationally complete measurements, qubit pairs, polarization qubits, linear optics, mutually unbiased bases, quantum state tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review