Photoemission-time-delay measurements and calculations close to the 3s-ionization-cross-section minimum in Ar
Open accessAbstract
We present experimental measurements and theoretical calculations of photoionization time delays from the $3s$ and $3p$ shells in Ar in the photon energy range of 32--42 eV. The experimental measurements are performed by interferometry using attosecond pulse trains and the infrared laser used for their generation. The theoretical approach includes intershell correlation effects between the $3s$ and $3p$ shells within the framework of the random-phase approximation with exchange. The connection between single-photon ionization and the two-color two-photon ionization process used in the measurement is established using the recently developed asymptotic approximation for the complex transition amplitudes of laser-assisted photoionization. We compare and discuss the theoretical and experimental results, especially in the region where strong intershell correlations in the $3s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}kp$ channel lead to an induced ``Cooper'' minimum in the 3s ionization cross section.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Photoionization can be studied by pump/probe schemes in combination with photoelectron spectroscopy.
“Photoionization can be studied by pump/probe schemes in combination with photoelectron spectroscopy [185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193].”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
Pump/probe schemes often use either single attosecond pulses with a rather intense infrared probe pulse or an attosecond pulse train with a weak infrared pulse.
“Pump/probe schemes often use either single attosecond pulses together with a rather intense infrared probe pulse [185,186,191] or an attosecond pulse train together with a weak infrared pulse [187-190, 192, 193].”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
A series of recent experimental reports showed that we now have the ability to characterize an escaping photoelectron wavepacket and its interaction with the ionic core.
“A series of recent experimental reports [185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193] showed that we now have the ability to characterize an escaping photoelectron wavepacket and its interaction with the ionic core.”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
This triggered theoretical studies of this interaction and of the effect of probing the system.
“This also triggered theoretical studies of this interaction as well as of the effect of probing the system [187,190,194].”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
Figure 22 shows the difference in time delays corresponding to ionization in the 3s and 3p ionization of argon.
“Figure 22 shows the difference in the time delays corresponding to ionization in the 3s and 3p ionization of argon [187].”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
Measured difference in photoionization time delays from the 3s and 3p shells in Ar.
“Measured difference in photoionization time delays from the 3s and 3p shells in Ar (solid dots).”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [187]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 139
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- J. M. Dahlstrom, D. Guénot, K. Klünder, M. Gisselbrecht, J. Mauritsson, A. L'Huillier, A. Maquet, and R. Taïeb, Chem. Phys. (in press, 2012).
- Authors
- Guénot, D., Klünder, K., Arnold, C. L., Kroon, D., Dahlström, J. M., Miranda, M., Fordell, T., Gisselbrecht, M., Johnsson, P., Mauritsson, J., Lindroth, E., Maquet, A., Taïeb, R., L’Huillier, A., & Kheifets, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Laboratoire de Chimie Physique - Matière et Rayonnement (FR)
- Australian National University (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-05-31
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2118230776
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lup.lub.lu.se
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Laserlab-Europe
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0031)
- Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- photoionization time delay, argon, Cooper minimum, attosecond interferometry, asymptotic approximation, random phase approximation with exchange, single-photon ionization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review