Cited by 159Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Generating shortcuts to adiabaticity in quantum and classical dynamics

Open access
Jarzynski, Christopher·2013·Physical Review A

Abstract

Transitionless quantum driving achieves adiabatic evolution in a hurry, using a counterdiabatic Hamiltonian to stifle nonadiabatic transitions. Here this shortcut to adiabaticity is cast in terms of a generator of adiabatic transport. This yields a classical analog of transitionless driving, and provides a strategy for constructing quantal counterdiabatic Hamiltonians. As an application of this framework, exact classical and quantal counterdiabatic terms are obtained for a particle in a box and for even-power-law potentials in one degree of freedom.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.88.040101

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The method of counter-diabatic driving circumvents the bottleneck of the adiabatic regime where proposals for implementation on current devices work with an approximate two-parameter Hamiltonian.

    “The method of counter-diabatic driving [190] circumvents the bottleneck of the adiabatic regime where proposals for implementation on current devices work with an approximate two-parameter Hamiltonian [111].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [12]E. Torrontegui, S. Ib´ a˜ nez, S. Mart´ ınez-Garaot, M. Modugno, A. del Campo, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga (2012), arXiv:1212.6343v1. · arXiv
  2. [15]J. W. Deng, Q. H. Wang, and J. B. Gong (2013), arXiv:1305.4207v1. · arXiv
  3. [18]L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960), 3rd ed., section 10.
  4. [20]J. R. Cary, D. F. Escande, and J. L. Tennyson, Physical Review A 34 , 4256 (1986).
  5. [21]J. L. Tennyson, J. R. Cary, and D. F. Escande, Physical Review Letters 56 , 2117 (1986).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarzynski, C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Jarzynski, Christopher
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2013-10-04
Volume
88
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2060246281
Cited by
159
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Keywords
shortcuts to adiabaticity, transitionless quantum driving, nonadiabatic transitions, particle in a box, quantum dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review