The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-distance quantum communication through any number of entanglement-swapping operations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yamamoto et al.'s work had the capability to extend the scheme to multipartite states and applicability with single-mode fibers.
“Other significant features reported in their work were the capability to extend the scheme to multipartite states, thanks precisely to the state-independence, and its applicability also with single-mode fibers.”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [388]
The Introduction and Conclusions describe Khalique and Sanders’s entanglement-swapping model, not features of Yamamoto et al.’s work. Searches for Yamamoto, multipartite states, state-independence, and single-mode fibers found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed capabilities. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1038/35106500 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340412331283633 · DOI
- 10.3233/JCS-2010-0373 · DOI
- T. R. Beals, 2008, Information Theoretic Security
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2009.231 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820918 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/033038 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340408233617 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.050302 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062310 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022336 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042304 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340600578369 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.063801 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Authors
- Khalique, A., & Sanders, B. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-09-03
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
