Cited by 37Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Quantum gates with controlled adiabatic evolutions

Open access
Hen, Itay·2015·Physical Review A

Abstract

We introduce a class of quantum adiabatic evolutions that we claim may be interpreted as the equivalents of the unitary gates of the quantum gate model. We argue that these gates form a universal set and may therefore be used as building blocks in the construction of arbitrary ``adiabatic circuits,'' analogously to the manner in which gates are used in the circuit model. One implication of the above construction is that arbitrary classical boolean circuits as well as gate model circuits may be directly translated to adiabatic algorithms with no additional resources or complexities. We show that while these adiabatic algorithms fail to exhibit certain aspects of the inherent fault tolerance of traditional quantum adiabatic algorithms, they may have certain other experimental advantages acting as quantum gates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.91.022309

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible to implement universal sets of quantum gates through controlled adiabatic evolutions (CAE).

    “In particular, it is possible to implement universal sets of quantum gates through controlled adiabatic evolutions (CAE)24.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [13]I. Hen, Europhysics Letters 105 , 50005 (2014), arXiv:1307.6538. · arXiv
  2. [16]G. Garci´ a de Polavieja and E. Sj¨ oqvist, American Journal of Physics 66 , 431 (1998), URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/66/5/10.
  3. [20]M. H. S. Amin, D. V. Averin, and J. A. Nesteroff, Phys. Rev. A 79 , 022107 (2009), (arXiv:0708.0384). · arXiv
  4. [22]A. C. M. Carollo and V. Vedral (2005), arXiv:quantph/0504205.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hen, I.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Hen, Itay
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
91
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2087352015
Cited by
37
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Army Research Office (W911NF-12-1-0523)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum adiabatic evolution, quantum gates, adiabatic circuits, universal gate set, adiabatic quantum computation, fault tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review