Quantum learning robust against noise
Open accessAbstract
Noise is often regarded as anathema to quantum computation, but in some settings it can be an unlikely ally. We consider the problem of learning the class of $n$-bit parity functions by making queries to a quantum example oracle. In the absence of noise, quantum and classical parity learning are easy and almost equally powerful, both information-theoretically and computationally. We show that in the presence of noise this story changes dramatically. Indeed, the classical learning problem is believed to be intractable, while the quantum version remains efficient. Depolarizing the qubits at the oracle's output at any constant nonzero rate does not increase the computational (or query) complexity of quantum learning more than logarithmically. However, the problem of learning from corresponding classical examples is the learning parity with noise problem, for which the best known algorithms have superpolynomial complexity. This creates the possibility of observing a quantum advantage with a few hundred noisy qubits. The presence of noise is essential for creating this quantum-classical separation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LPN leverages the noise presented in NISQ devices.
“it actually leverages the noise presented in the NISQ devices [30]”
From QASMBench: A Low-Level Quantum Benchmark Suite for NISQ Evaluation and Simulation (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279 · see citing works
Quantum Support Vector Machine for Big Data Classification
Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., & Lloyd, S. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Russian Mathematical Surveys · doi:10.1070/rm1997v052n06abeh002155 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (1997) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '97 · doi:10.1145/258533.258579 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Noise-tolerant learning, the parity problem, and the statistical query model
Blum, A., Kalai, A., & Wasserman, H. (2003) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/792538.792543 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on quantum computing technology
Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Distributed secure quantum machine learning
Sheng, Y.-B., & Zhou, L. (2017) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.06.007 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
QASMBench: A Low-Level Quantum Benchmark Suite for NISQ Evaluation and Simulation
Li, A., Stein, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., & Ang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3550488 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Circuit-Based Quantum Random Access Memory for Classical Data
Park, D. K., Petruccione, F., & Rhee, J.-K. K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40439-3 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Our brains sense the future through a new quantum-like implicit learning mechanism
Escolà-Gascón, Á. (2024) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.111048 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cross, A. W., Smith, G., & Smolin, J. A.
- Affiliations
- IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-07-27
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1820615084
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CCF-1110941)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum machine learning, learning parity with noise, depolarizing noise, quantum advantage, query complexity, noisy qubits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review