Cited by 29Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Quantum speed limit for a relativistic electron in a uniform magnetic field

Open access
Villamizar, D. V., Duzzioni, E. I.·2015·Physical Review A

Abstract

We analyze the influence of relativistic effects on the minimum evolution time between two orthogonal states of a quantum system. Defining the initial state as a homogeneous superposition between two Hamiltonian eigenstates of an electron in a uniform magnetic field, we obtain a relation between the minimum evolution time and the displacement of the mean radial position of the electron wave packet. The quantum speed limit time is calculated for an electron dynamics described by Dirac and Schr\"odinger-Pauli equations considering different parameters, such as the strength of magnetic field and the linear momentum of the electron in the axial direction. We highlight that when the electron undergoes a region with extremely strong magnetic field the relativistic and nonrelativistic dynamics differ substantially, so that the description given by the Schr\"odinger-Pauli equation enables the electron to travel faster than $c$, which is prohibited by Einstein's theory of relativity. This approach allows a connection between the abstract Hilbert space and the space-time coordinates, besides the identification of the most appropriate quantum dynamics used to describe the electron motion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.92.042106

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For relativistic Dirac dynamics, Villamizar and Duzzioni derived the quantum speed limit time in equation (130), which becomes equivalent to the Schrödinger quantum speed limit time in the non-relativistic limit.

    “For the relativistic Dirac dynamics (126) we obtain [227] τ D QSL = π (mc 2 ) 2 + 4 c 2 e B -(mc 2 ) 2 + 2 c 2 e B π 2cβ √ 2 -1 (130 ) where the second equality holds for strong magnetic fields, c 2 e B (mc 2 ) 2 , and where β = eB/2 .Note that in the non-relativistic limit τ S QSL and τ D QSL become equivalent.”
  • Villamizar and Duzzioni resolved the Einstein-Bohr debate by bringing the energy-time uncertainty principle into agreement with special relativity.

    “Finally, it is interesting to note that in passing Villamizar and Duzzioni [227] resolved the longstanding debate of Einstein and Bohr (see section 1) by bringing the energy-time uncertainty principle in full agreement with special relativity.”
  • For strong magnetic fields, the average speed computed from Schrödinger dynamics can exceed the speed of light, whereas the Dirac average speed remains below c even for arbitrarily strong fields.

    “We immediately see that for strong magnetic fields, B 1, the average speed computed from the Schrödinger dynamics can surpass the speed of light, c.As expected, this is not the case for the Dirac equation, and even for arbitrarily strong fields B we always have v D < c.”
  • Villamizar and Duzzioni concluded that the quantum speed limit can be used to check the physical consistency of a physical model.

    “Thus, Villamizar and Duzzioni [227] conclude that the quantum speed limit can be used to check the physical consistency of a physical model.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [21]Paul Strange, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: with applications in condensed matter and atomic physics , ISBN : 9780521565837, Cambridge University Press (1998).
  2. [22]For a review on relativistic quantum mechanics at lowenergies see Pekka Pyykk¨ o, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 63 , 45 (2012).
  3. [23]Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, Franck Lalo; Quantum mechanics vol.1 Section D VI , ISBN : 978-0471-16433-3, Wiley (1991).
  4. [24]Daijiro Yoshioka, The Quantum Hall Effect , Chapter 2, ISBN : 978-3-642-07720-3, Springer (2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villamizar, D. V., & Duzzioni, E. I.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2015-10-09
Volume
92
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2259713265
Cited by
29
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum speed limit, relativistic electrons, uniform magnetic field, Dirac equation, Schrödinger-Pauli equation, electron wave packets, superluminal motion, high magnetic fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review