Cited by 218Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics

A unitarity bound on the evolution of nonstationary states

Fleming, G. N.·1973·Il Nuovo Cimento A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02819419

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleming, G. N.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Fleming, G. N.
Venue
Il Nuovo Cimento A
Published
1973-07
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
232-240
ISSN
  • 0369-3546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1826-9869
OpenAlex
W1628969462
Cited by
218
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Keywords
unitary limit, nonstationary states, state integrity, quantum state evolution, rigorous bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review