Cited by 8Atomic and Molecular PhysicsAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsParticle accelerators and beam dynamics

Lifetime of the metastable P1/22 state of F-like Ar9+ isolated in a compact Penning trap

Abstract

Multiply ionized atoms of a single charge state can be captured at low energy in a compact Penning trap, allowing the measurement of the radiative lifetime of an atomic state that decays via weakly allowed transitions. Such a measurement is reported here for the radiative decay lifetime of the metastable $^{2}P_{1/2}$ state in fluorinelike ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{9+}$, wherein the $n=2$ shell has only one vacancy (hole) in a $2p$ orbital. Highly ionized atoms are extracted from an electron beam ion trap and guided into the ion capture apparatus. Upon capturing the ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{9+}$ ions, light from the magnetic-dipole transition is detected with a photomultiplier tube and counted with a multichannel scaler. Using this technique, the radiative lifetime of the metastable $^{2}P_{1/2}$ state in ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{9+}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}1{s}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}2{s}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}2{p}^{5}$ is measured to be $\ensuremath{\tau}=9.31\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08$ ms, consistent with a previous intra-EBIT measurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.98.032501

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many atomic ions with a nuclear quadrupole moment (I ≥ 1) possess ground-state clock transitions at non-zero magnetic field that are first-order insensitive to field fluctuations.

    “Many atomic ions with a nuclear quadrupole moment (i.e. nuclear spin I ≥ 1) possess ground-state 'clock' transitions at non-zero magnetic field that are first-order insensitive to field fluctuations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. P. R. Young, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 323, 243
  2. A. Naing, http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.DAMOP.Q1.23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, S. M., Dreiling, J. M., Guise, N. D., Hoogerheide, S. F., Naing, A. S., & Tan, J. N.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Samuel M.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2018-09-06
Volume
98
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W2891149982
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Keywords
radiative lifetime, multiply charged ions, Penning trap, electron beam ion trap, magnetic dipole transitions, highly charged ions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review