Cited by 16Fluid Dynamics and Heat TransferRocket and propulsion systems researchCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing

Marangoni Effect in Bipropellant Droplet Mixing during Hypergolic Ignition

Open access
Sun, Kai, Jia, Feifei, Zhang, Peng, Shu, Lingyun, Wang, Tianyou·2021·Physical Review Applied

Abstract

Hypergolic ignition of a bipropellant is an intrinsically nonpremixed physicochemical process that involves both chemistry and fluidic mixing. While the ignition delay time (IDT) of various hypergolic propellants has been extensively measured by using the prevalent droplet test, the effect of fluidic mixing on the hypergolic ignition process has rarely been studied. Compared with the well-understood droplet mixing within the same liquid, a prominent feature of bipropellant droplet mixing is the substantial surface tension difference, which induces a Marangoni effect upon droplet coalescence; however, it has not been addressed by previous hypergolic ignition studies and still remains inadequately understood. In this work, we numerically study the internal mixing of colliding droplets of different surface tensions with implications for hypergolic propellant ignition. The results show that the Marangoni effect substantially enhances droplet mixing compared with the situation without surface tension difference, and indicate the Marangoni effect could be a pivotal physical mechanism in hypergolic ignition. In particular, we identify an interesting phenomenon in that the Marangoni effect yields a nonmonotonic variation of internal mixing with increasing impact inertia, and this provides a likely interpretation of the nonmonotonic variation of the IDT experimentally observed by Zhang et al. [Combust. Flame 173, 276--287 (2016)]. Although binary droplet collision is employed as the specific object of the study, the present results could also provide insight into the hypergolic ignition of a bipropellant using various mixing methodologies, such as impinging jet and droplet-pool impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034076

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nonmonotonic IDT is caused by Marangoni-driven mixing as We increases.

    “The results suggest that the nonmonotonic IDT is caused by Marangoni-driven mixing as increasing We.”

    From Droplet collision of hypergolic propellants (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. J. Dennis, T. Pourpoint, and S. Son, in the 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics (AIAA, San Diego, California, 2011).
  2. J. Dennis, S. Son, and T. Pourpoint, in the 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics (AIAA, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012).
  3. D. Bittner, J. Sell, and G. Risha, in the 49th AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Amer- ican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA, San Jose, CA, 2013).
  4. T. Pourpoint and W. Anderson, in the 41th AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Amer- ican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA, Tucson, Arizona, 2005).
  5. J. Forness, T. Pourpoint, and S. Heister, in the 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics (AIAA, San Jose, CA, 2013).
  6. D. Zhang, Ph.D. thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Uni- versity, 2018.
  7. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supple mental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034076 for temporal evolution of the spreading distance of the lower-surface- tension-fluid, grid dependence study, and comparison of the mixing index and the cumulative mixing index at low Weber numbers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, K., Jia, F., Zhang, P., Shu, L., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
Physical Review Applied
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
15
Issue
3
ISSN
2331-7019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3150304836
Cited by
16
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Applied (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52076147)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Tianjin Youth Talent Promotion Project (TJSQNTJ-2018-07)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Keywords
Marangoni convection, hypergolic ignition, droplet mixing, surface tension difference, droplet coalescence, binary droplet collision, ignition delay, non-monotonic behavior, impinging jet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review