Cited by 203Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsTopology Optimization in EngineeringAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies

Topology-Optimized Multilayered Metaoptics

Open access
Lin, Zin, Groever, Benedikt, Capasso, Federico, Rodriguez, Alejandro W., Lončar, Marko·2018·Physical Review Applied

Abstract

Compact metasurface devices herald an exciting revolution in optics technology. Their design complexity and functionality has been restricted to intuitive by-hand designs for single-layered devices. This study proposes a large-scale approach known as topology optimization, applied to multiple, closely spaced device layers, which greatly expands the scope and functionality of metadevices. In particular, the authors demonstrate angular phase control, the ability to encode arbitrary information using different angles of incidence, which enables $e.g.$ the design of a one-piece, aberration-corrected metalens, and of an angle-convergent metalens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevapplied.9.044030

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Topology optimization has been used to design photonic crystals, integrated photonics devices, and metamaterials with superior performance metrics than those based on conventional designs.

    “This technique has been used to design photonic crystals [15], integrated photonics devices [16,17], and metamaterials [18–24] with superior performance metrics than those based on conventional designs.”

    From Robust design of topology-optimized metasurfaces (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Z., Groever, B., Capasso, F., Rodriguez, A. W., & Lončar, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Applied
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
9
Issue
4
ISSN
2331-7019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098148120
Cited by
203
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Applied (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Keywords
topology optimization, meta-optics, aberration correction, metalenses, metadevices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review