Cited by 86Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plaquette versus ordinary d -wave pairing in the t′ -Hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder

Open access
Chung, Chia-Min, Qin, Mingpu, Zhang, Shiwei, Schollwöck, Ulrich, White, Steven R., The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem·2020·Physical Review B

Abstract

The Hubbard model and its extensions are important microscopic models for understanding high-${T}_{c}$ superconductivity in cuprates. In the model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ (the ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$-Hubbard model), pairing is strongly influenced by ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. In particular, a recent study on a width-4 cylinder observed quasi-long-range superconducting order, associated with a negative ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, which was taken to imply superconductivity in the two-dimensional (2D) limit. In this work we study more carefully pairing in the width-$4\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$-Hubbard model. We show that in this specific system, the pairing symmetry with ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}<0$ is not the ordinary $d$-wave one would expect in the 2D limit. Instead we observe a so-called plaquette $d$-wave pairing. We show that the plaquette $d$-wave or its extension is difficult to generalize in other geometries, for example a 4-leg ladder with open boundaries or a width-6 cylinder. We find that a negative ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ suppresses the conventional $d$-wave, leading to plaquette pairing. In contrast, a different ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}$ coupling acting diagonally on the plaquettes suppresses plaquette pairing, leading to conventional $d$-wave pairing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.102.041106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3759 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4403 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085140 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085103 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046402 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035126 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.aam7127 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045138 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.136403 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.116402 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.075108 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.aat1773 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/375561a0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nature02574 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.1138584 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.075112 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195139 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125125 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4486 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00269-3 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134501 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.245155 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195141 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155116 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R753 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.220504 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155115 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.7464 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235119 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chung, C.-M., Qin, M., Zhang, S., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., & The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
102
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W3016037117
Cited by
86
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (390814868)
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1812558)
  • Simons Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
d-wave pairing, next-nearest-neighbor hopping, cuprate superconductivity, open boundary conditions, pairing symmetry, high-temperature superconductivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review