The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plaquette versus ordinary d -wave pairing in the t′ -Hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder
Open accessAbstract
The Hubbard model and its extensions are important microscopic models for understanding high-${T}_{c}$ superconductivity in cuprates. In the model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ (the ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$-Hubbard model), pairing is strongly influenced by ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. In particular, a recent study on a width-4 cylinder observed quasi-long-range superconducting order, associated with a negative ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, which was taken to imply superconductivity in the two-dimensional (2D) limit. In this work we study more carefully pairing in the width-$4\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$-Hubbard model. We show that in this specific system, the pairing symmetry with ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}<0$ is not the ordinary $d$-wave one would expect in the 2D limit. Instead we observe a so-called plaquette $d$-wave pairing. We show that the plaquette $d$-wave or its extension is difficult to generalize in other geometries, for example a 4-leg ladder with open boundaries or a width-6 cylinder. We find that a negative ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ suppresses the conventional $d$-wave, leading to plaquette pairing. In contrast, a different ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}$ coupling acting diagonally on the plaquettes suppresses plaquette pairing, leading to conventional $d$-wave pairing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These differences have not been clear in previous studies on narrower cylinders, which are impacted by strong finite-size effects.
“These differences have not been clear in previous studies on narrower cylinders, which are impacted by strong finite-size effects ( 48,49 ).”
From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Self-citationSuperconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t ′
Jiang, H.-C., & Devereaux, T. P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal5304 · Cited by 228
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3759 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4403 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085140 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035126 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aam7127 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045138 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.136403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.116402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.075108 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aat1773 · DOI
- 10.1038/375561a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02574 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1138584 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.075112 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195139 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125125 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4486 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00269-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.245155 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195141 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155116 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R753 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.220504 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155115 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.7464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235119 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model
Xu, H., Chung, C.-M., Qin, M., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh7691 · Cited by 144
“[Deviations are visible from width-4 systems, which can have different pairing symmetry from ordinary d -wave pairing ( 50 ).]”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, C.-M., Qin, M., Zhang, S., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., & The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- William & Mary (US)
- Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-07-06
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W3016037117
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (390814868)
- National Science Foundation (DMR-1812558)
- Simons Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Keywords
- d-wave pairing, next-nearest-neighbor hopping, cuprate superconductivity, open boundary conditions, pairing symmetry, high-temperature superconductivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review