Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

k→·p→perturbation theory in III-V compounds and alloys: a reexamination

Hermann, Claudine, Weisbuch, Claude·1977·Physical Review B

Abstract

From the recent optical conduction-electron spin-resonance (CESR) measurements of the $g$ factors ${g}^{*}$ in III-V compounds and the known effective masses ${m}^{*}$, in the framework of the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{k}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{p}}$ perturbation theory, we determine an experimental value of the interband matrix element ${P}^{2}=(\frac{2}{{m}_{0}}){|〈S|{p}_{x}|X〉|}^{2}$ coupling the conduction band and the upper valence bands. ${P}^{2}$ ranges from 21 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1.5 eV in InP to 29 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1 eV in GaAs. This unexpected strong variation can be justified by a crude tight-binding calculation, evidencing the combined influence of ionicity and cell dimension. We show that ${g}^{*}$ can be calculated with a precision of 10% in a three-band calculation, whereas a multiband approximation is required for ${m}^{*}$. The good agreement between our CESR measurements of the $g$ factors in ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{In}}_{x}\mathrm{As}$ and ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Al}}_{x}\mathrm{As}$ and the calculated values by $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{k}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{p}}$ theory shows the correctness of this theory in alloys. Moreover, it is possible to obtain a satisfactory fit of the effective-mass data previously unexplained within simple $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{k}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{p}}$ theory by using a multiband model and correct values of ${P}^{2}$. The modifications to $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{k}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{p}}$ theory involving random potentials and strains are then not necessary at the precision of the experimental data available up to now.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.15.823

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Hermann, C., & Weisbuch, C.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1977-01-15
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
823-833
ISSN
0556-2805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080634252
Cited by
503
References
17
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: k→·p→perturbation theory in III-V compounds and alloys: a reexamination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.15.823
The paper
Hermann, C., & Weisbuch, C. (1977). k→·p→perturbation theory in III-V compounds and alloys: a reexamination. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.15.823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.