Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep-level optical spectroscopy in GaAs

Chantre, A., Vincent, G., Bois, D.·1981·Physical Review B

Abstract

An experimental method which we call deep-level optical spectroscopy (DLOS) is described. It is based on photostimulated capacitance transients measurements after electrical, thermal, or optical excitation of the sample, i.e., a diode. This technique provides the spectral distribution of both ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{n}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{p}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$, the optical cross sections for the transitions between a deep-level and the conduction and valence bands. Besides its sensitivity, DLOS is selective in the double sense that ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{n}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{p}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ are unambiguously separated, and that the signals due to different traps can be resolved from one another. As a result, the ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ spectra are measured from their threshold up to the energy gap of the semiconductor, over a generally large temperature range. In addition, the straightforward coupling of DLOS with deep-level transient spectroscopy allows a clear identification of the optical spectra with known levels and the simultaneous determination of both thermal and optical properties for each defect. This experimental method has been used to analyze the most commonly observed deep levels in GaAs. For the well known "O" level, a comprehensive analysis of the results obtained through other techniques (as reported in the literature) is given, to compare with our DLOS data. The spectral shape of all ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{n}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ curves appears to be strongly related to the density-of-states distribution in the conduction band, i.e., transitions towards $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$, $L$, and $X$ minima of this band are generally well resolved; this is a unique feature of DLOS. A simple theoretical model is proposed to take advantage of these newly available experimental data and to explain the sharpness of the ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{p}^{0}(\mathrm{hv})$ curves, as compared with, e.g., Lucovsky's model. Phonon coupling is taken into account. A good fit of the DLOS results is obtained with a small number of adjustable parameters: the deep-level envelope wave function extent (in the $\ensuremath{\delta}$-potential approximation), the relative transition probabilities to the various conduction-band minima, and the Franck-Condon parameter. The values thus obtained for these physical parameters are discussed, and finally, all results concerning each trap are summarized on a configuration coordinate diagram.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.23.5335

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Chantre, A., Vincent, G., & Bois, D.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1981-05-15
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
5335-5359
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987037086
Cited by
461
References
9
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep-level optical spectroscopy in GaAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.23.5335
The paper
Chantre, A., Vincent, G., & Bois, D. (1981). Deep-level optical spectroscopy in GaAs. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.23.5335

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.