Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pseudopotentials that work: From H to Pu

Bachelet, G. B., Hamann, D. R., Schlüter, M.·1982·Physical Review B

Abstract

Recent developments have enabled pseudopotential methods to reproduce accurately the results of all-electron calculations for the self-consistent electronic structure of atoms, molecules, and solids. The properties of these potentials are discussed in the context of earlier approaches, and their numerous recent successful applications are summarized. While the generation of these pseudopotentials from all-electron atom calculations is straightforward in principle, detailed consideration of the differences in physics of various groups of atoms is necessary to achieve pseudopotentials with the most desirable attributes. One important attribute developed here is optimum transferability to various systems. Another is the ability to be fitted with a small set of analytic functions useful with a variety of wave-function representations. On the basis of these considerations, a consistent set of pseudopotentials has been developed for the entire Periodic Table. Relativistic effects are included in a way that enables the potentials to be used in nonrelativistic formulations. The scheme used to generate the numerical potentials, the fitting procedure, and the testing of the fit are discussed. Representative examples of potentials are shown that display attributes spanning the set. A complete tabulation of the fitted potentials is given along with a guide to its use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.26.4199

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 3,385

Metadata

Authors
Bachelet, G. B., Hamann, D. R., & Schlüter, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1982-10-15
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
4199-4228
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992753351
Cited by
3,385
References
2
FWCI
26.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.