The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudopotentials that work: From H to Pu
Abstract
Recent developments have enabled pseudopotential methods to reproduce accurately the results of all-electron calculations for the self-consistent electronic structure of atoms, molecules, and solids. The properties of these potentials are discussed in the context of earlier approaches, and their numerous recent successful applications are summarized. While the generation of these pseudopotentials from all-electron atom calculations is straightforward in principle, detailed consideration of the differences in physics of various groups of atoms is necessary to achieve pseudopotentials with the most desirable attributes. One important attribute developed here is optimum transferability to various systems. Another is the ability to be fitted with a small set of analytic functions useful with a variety of wave-function representations. On the basis of these considerations, a consistent set of pseudopotentials has been developed for the entire Periodic Table. Relativistic effects are included in a way that enables the potentials to be used in nonrelativistic formulations. The scheme used to generate the numerical potentials, the fitting procedure, and the testing of the fit are discussed. Representative examples of potentials are shown that display attributes spanning the set. A complete tabulation of the fitted potentials is given along with a guide to its use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism
Vanderbilt, D. (1990) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.7892 · Cited by 23,185
Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials
Hamann, D. R. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.085117 · Cited by 3,379
Self-citationPseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu
Dal Corso, A. (2014) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043 · Cited by 2,016
Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations
Garrity, K. F., Bennett, J. W., Rabe, K. M., & Vanderbilt, D. (2014) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053 · Cited by 1,644
Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials
Schlipf, M., & Gygi, F. (2015) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.05.011 · Cited by 1,300
Analysis of separable potentials
Gonze, X., Stumpf, R., & Scheffler, M. (1991) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.8503 · Cited by 605
Sitch, P. K., Jones, R., Öberg, S., & Heggie, M. I. (1995) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.52.4951 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Bachelet, G. B., Hamann, D. R., & Schlüter, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1982-10-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4199-4228
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992753351
- Cited by
- 3,385
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.