The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conductivity and permeability of rocks
Abstract
The electrical conductivity of salt-water-saturated rocks is modeled by a random resistance network which has a zero percolation threshold. The porosity is varied by a random bond-shrinkage mechanism. Numerical and analytical calculations of the model in different dimensions show an Archie's-law behavior: ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{r}=a{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{w}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{m}$, where $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ is the porosity of the rock, and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{r}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{w}$ are the conductivities of the rock and water, respectively. We find that the Archie's exponent $m$ is always greater than unity and is related to the skewness of the "pore-size distribution" of the rock. Applying the same model to fluid-flow permeability (${k}_{r}$) gives ${k}_{r} \ensuremath{\propto}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{{m}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$, where ${m}^{\ensuremath{'}}=m(m+1)$ in one dimension, and ${m}^{\ensuremath{'}}=2m$ in higher dimensions. This power-law form is consistent with the well-known Kozeny equation and has been frequently suggested by empirical studies. Experimental tests of the model are performed on artificial rocks, made by fusing small glass beads, as well as real rocks. From resistivity measurements, we demonstrate that $m$ is larger in samples with a wider fluctuation of pore sizes, which is qualitatively consistent with the model. From fluid-flow experiments on fused glass beads, we find quantitative support for the ${m}^{\ensuremath{'}}=2m$ prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Cited by
Sahimi, M. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.1393 · Cited by 1,082
Permeability, conductivity, and pore geometry of sandstone
Doyen, P. M. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib07p07729 · Cited by 386
Modelling of exfoliated graphite
CELZARD, A., MARECHE, J., & FURDIN, G. (2005) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.01.001 · Cited by 275
Thermal evolution of permeability and microstructure in sea ice
Golden, K. M., Eicken, H., Heaton, A. L., Miner, J., Pringle, D. J., & Zhu, J. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2007gl030447 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, P.-Z., Koplik, J., & Tomanic, J. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1984-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6606-6614
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009887903
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conductivity and permeability of rocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.30.6606
- The paper
- Wong, P.-Z., Koplik, J., & Tomanic, J. P. (1984). Conductivity and permeability of rocks. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.30.6606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.