Cited by 896Quantum and electron transport phenomenaQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics

Dynamic localization of a charged particle moving under the influence of an electric field

Dunlap, D. H., Kenkre, V. M.·1986·Physical Review B

Abstract

The motion of a charged particle on a discrete lattice under the action of an electric field is studied with the help of explicit calculations of probability propagators and mean-square displacements. Exact results are presented for arbitrary time dependence of the electric field on a one-dimensional lattice. Existing results for the limiting cases of zero frequency and zero field are recovered. A new phenomenon involving the dynamic localization of the moving particle is shown to result in the case of a sinusoidally varying field: The particle is generally delocalized except for the cases when the ratio of the field magnitude and the field frequency is a root of the ordinary Bessel function of order 0. For these special cases it is found to be localized. This localization could be used, in principle, for inducing anisotropy in the transport properties of an ordinarily isotropic material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.34.3625

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It was predicted in 1986 that a time-periodic transverse electric field causes periodic collapse of the evolving wavefunction, known as dynamic localization.

    “it was predicted in 1986 that a transverse electric field, which is periodic in time (ac field), yields periodic collapse of the evolving wavefunction, which is well known as dynamic localization (DL) [43].”
  • Control over the sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice, Raman-assisted tunneling or embedding defects in infinite arrays.

    “Control over this sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice [16-21], Raman-assisted tunneling [22, 23] or embedding defects in infinite arrays [24].”

    From Universal Sign Control of Coupling in Tight-Binding Lattices (2016) · cites this paper as [16]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunlap, D. H., & Kenkre, V. M.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1986-09-15
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
3625-3633
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085247228
Cited by
896
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 35
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. B, Condensed matter (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Keywords
dynamical localization, charged particle motion, electric field, discrete lattices, mean square displacement, zeros of Bessel functions, time-dependent fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review