The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic and atomic structure of amorphous carbon
Abstract
The electronic structure of amorphous carbon and hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H) has been investigated through calculations on a number of model structures containing different configurations of ${\mathrm{sp}}^{2}$ and ${\mathrm{sp}}^{3}$ sites. We find that the most stable arrangement of ${\mathrm{sp}}^{2}$ sites is in compact clusters of fused sixfold rings, i.e., graphitic layers. The width of the optical gap is found to vary inversely with the ${\mathrm{sp}}^{2}$ cluster size, and the \ensuremath{\sim}0.5-eV optical gap of evaporated amorphous carbon is found to be consistent with a model of disordered graphitic layers of about 15 A\r{} in diameter, bounded by ${\mathrm{sp}}^{3}$ sites. It is argued that a-C forms such finite clusters in order to relieve strain. It is then shown that the 1.5--2.5-eV optical gap of a-C:H is unusually small and requires that both its valence and conduction band consist of \ensuremath{\pi} states on ${\mathrm{sp}}^{2}$ sites and that these sites must also be significantly clustered, such as in graphitic clusters containing four or more rings. In other words, the optical gap of both a-C and a-C:H depends on their degree of medium-range order, rather than just on their short-range order as is the case in most amorphous semiconductors. We have also studied the nature of states away from the gap in order to interpret the photoemission data and the carbon 1s core-level absorption spectra. The nature of defects and midgap states is discussed, and it is predicted that the defect density decreases with increasing band gap. Finally it is argued that the doping of a-C:H by group-III and -V elements proceeds via a substitution mechanism, as in a-Si:H, in spite of the coordination disorder present in a-C:H. Doping is also expected to be accompanied by an increase in gap states, as in a-Si:H.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Molecules in Carbon Vapor
Pitzer, K. S., & Clementi, E. (1959) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01526a010 · Cited by 420
Hoffmann, R. (1966) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/0040-4020(66)80020-0 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon
Ferrari, A. C., & Robertson, J. (2000) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.14095 · Cited by 15,651
Self-citationCarbon quantum dots and their applications
Lim, S. Y., Shen, W., & Gao, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00269e · Cited by 4,976
Chemically Derived Graphene Oxide: Towards Large‐Area Thin‐Film Electronics and Optoelectronics
Eda, G., & Chhowalla, M. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200903689 · Cited by 2,283
Shen, J., Zhu, Y., Yang, X., & Li, C. (2012) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc00110a · Cited by 2,071
Raman spectroscopy on amorphous carbon films
Schwan, J., Ulrich, S., Batori, V., Ehrhardt, H., & Silva, S. R. P. (1996) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.362745 · Cited by 1,381
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, J., & O’Reilly, E. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1987-02-15
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2946-2957
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973566553
- Cited by
- 1,387
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.