The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic structure of ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe, and their pseudobinary alloys
Abstract
Using the all-electron mixed-basis approach to the density-functional formalism for crystals, we calculate from first principles the electronic structure of zinc-blende ZnS, ZnSe, and ZnTe as well as that of their ordered pseudobinary alloys ${\mathrm{Zn}}_{2}$SSe, ${\mathrm{Zn}}_{2}$SeTe, and ${\mathrm{Zn}}_{2}$STe. For the latter we use as a model a CuAu I-like structure (space group $P\overline{4}m2$), and analyze the observed optical bowing in terms of three contributions: (i) a volume deformation of the band structure due to the replacement of the lattice constants of the binary constituents by that of the alloy, (ii) a chemical-electronegativity contribution due to charge exchange in the alloy relative to its constituent binary subsystems, and (iii) a structural contribution due to the relaxation of the anion-cation bond lengths in the alloy. The total bowing effect [the sum of (i)-(iii) above] agrees well with observations, yet the present analysis suggests a physical mechanism for optical bowing which differs profoundly from that offered by the popular virtual-crystal approach. The maximum contribution of disorder to the optical bowing is calculated for $\mathrm{Zn}{\mathrm{S}}_{x}{\mathrm{Te}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ using a cluster-averaging method, resulting in a reduction in the bowing of the fundamental gap. We further discuss the band structures, x-ray scattering factors, charge distribution, and deformation potentials of the binary zinc chalcogenides and their ordered alloys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Self-citationBond lengths around isovalent impurities and in semiconductor solid solutions
Martins, J. L., & Zunger, A. (1984) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.30.6217 · Cited by 435
Self-citationLocal structure of ionic solid solutions: Extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure study
Boyce, J. B., & Mikkelsen, J. C. (1985) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.31.6903 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Alloyed Semiconductor Quantum Dots: Tuning the Optical Properties without Changing the Particle Size
Bailey, R. E., & Nie, S. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja035000o · Cited by 936
Giant and Composition-Dependent Optical Bowing Coefficient in GaAsN Alloys
Wei, S.-H., & Zunger, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.664 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernard, J. E., & Zunger, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1987-08-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3199-3228
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025029579
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.