Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 716

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-principles study of the atomic reconstructions and energies of Ga- and As-stabilized GaAs(100) surfaces

Qian, Guo-Xin, Martin, Richard M., Chadi, D. J.·1988·Physical Review B

Abstract

We have carried out ab initio total-energy density-functional calculations to study the reconstructions of GaAs(100) surfaces as a function of Ga and As surface coverage. Equilibrium atomic geometries and energies for Ga- and As-stabilized 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1, 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1, 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2, and 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 surfaces consisting of various combinations of dimers and vacancies were determined. Dimerization of Ga (As) surface atoms is calculated to lower the energy by 1.7 eV (0.7 eV) per dimer and to lead to the most stable atomic configurations. For half-monolayer coverages, relaxation energies are very large, and nondimerized structures are only slightly (0.03--0.05 eV per 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 cell) higher in energy. Asymmetric dimers were tested for As surfaces and found to be higher in energy than symmetric dimers. The stability of surfaces in equilibrium with Ga and As sources is considered and it is shown that the chemical potentials are restricted within limits set by the free energies of the elemental bulk phases of Ga and As. Ab initio calculations of these bulk energies at T=0 K determine the limiting chemical potentials and also the heat of formation, which we find to be 0.73 eV per GaAs pair, compared with the experimental value of 0.74 eV. Our calculations indicate that with excess bulk As available, a full monolayer coverage of As is energetically more favorable than a half-monolayer coverage, whereas with excess Ga available, the surface energy of full and half-monolayer coverages are nearly the same. To examine the effects of larger unit-cell dimensions on total energies, we rely on results from tight-binding calculations. For half-monolayer coverages, 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4 unit cells are found to have a significantly lower energy than 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 cells not because of a greater lattice relaxation but because of orbital rehybridization effects which are not possible in a smaller cell. The results of the ab initio and tight-binding calculations indicate that the optimal surface coverage for Ga- and As-terminated surfaces is less than a full monolayer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.38.7649

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 716

Metadata

Authors
Qian, G.-X., Martin, R. M., & Chadi, D. J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1988-10-15
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
7649-7663
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034210026
Cited by
716
References
2
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles study of the atomic reconstructions and energies of Ga- and As-stabilized GaAs(100) surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.38.7649
The paper
Qian, G.-X., Martin, R. M., & Chadi, D. J. (1988). First-principles study of the atomic reconstructions and energies of Ga- and As-stabilized GaAs(100) surfaces. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.38.7649

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.