Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 991

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase diagram ofLixC6

Dahn, J. R.·1991·Physical Review B

Abstract

Using lithium/graphite electrochemical cells and in situ x-ray diffraction, we have determined the phase diagram of ${\mathrm{Li}}_{\mathit{x}}$${\mathrm{C}}_{6}$ for 0x1 and 0 \ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}CT70 \ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C. We find several differences between our results and previous work. For x0.04, the intercalated Li is randomly distributed throughout the graphite host in a dilute stage-1 phase. As x increases past 0.04, a clear coexistence between this phase and a stage-4 phase is observed. As x increases further at 21 \ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C, transitions to stage 3, to a ``liquidlike'' stage-2 phase (denoted 2L), to stage 2, and finally to filled stage 1 occur sequentially as expected on the basis of previous work. We have been able to accurately determine the ranges in x and in T of the single-phase and the coexisting-phase regions. Clear coexisting-phase regions are observed (indicating first-order transitions) for all the transitions except for the stage-4 to -3 transition. We discuss the difference between this transition and the others. The average layer spacing of ${\mathrm{Li}}_{\mathit{x}}$${\mathrm{C}}_{6}$ has been measured as a function of x.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.44.9170

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 991

Metadata

Authors
Dahn, J. R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
44
Issue
17
Pages
9170-9177
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2072096893
Cited by
991
References
5
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.