The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ac conduction and 1/f noise in a Cr-film lattice-percolation system
Abstract
The ac conductivity \ensuremath{\sigma}(\ensuremath{\omega}), ac dielectric constant \ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega}), and (1/f)-noise spectral density ${\mathit{S}}_{\mathit{v}}$(f) have been studied in a Cr-film lattice-percolation system generated by electron-beam lithography. A power-law behavior, \ensuremath{\sigma}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\propto}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}^{\mathit{x}}$ and \ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\propto}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathit{y}}$, is observed near the percolation threshold. The ac-conductivity and ac-dielectric-constant exponents x and y are found to be 0.98\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.09 and 0.08\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04, respectively. While these results satisfy the general scaling law x+y=1 and are consistent with those previously obtained on Au-film continuum-percolation systems, they cannot be explained by present percolation theories applied to two-dimensional (2D) systems. The normalized (1/f)-noise spectral density ${\mathit{S}}_{\mathit{v}}$(f)/${\mathit{V}}^{2}$ is found to scale as ${\mathit{R}}^{\mathit{w}}$ (where R is the sample resistance) with critical exponent w=1.18\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.19. Once again, the numerical value of w is appreciably different from the predictions of present percolation theories applied to 2D systems. We discuss the discrepancy between the experimental results and percolation theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kirkpatrick, S. (1973) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.45.574 · Cited by 5,260
Wooten, F., & Davis, S. P. (1973) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1987434 · Cited by 4,518
Introduction to Percolation Theory
Stauffer, D., & Aharony, A. (1985) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203211595 · Cited by 3,727
Scaling theory of percolation clusters
Stauffer, D. (1979) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90060-7 · Cited by 2,365
Experimental studies on 1/f noise
Hooge, F. N., Kleinpenning, T. G. M., & Vandamme, L. K. J. (1981) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/44/5/001 · Cited by 1,153
Diffusion in regular and disordered lattices
Haus, J. W., & Kehr, K. W. (1987) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90005-6 · Cited by 1,122
Anomalous Diffusion on Percolating Clusters
Gefen, Y., Aharony, A., & Alexander, S. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.77 · Cited by 1,029
Essam, J. W. (1980) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/43/7/001 · Cited by 1,018
Efros, A. L., & Shklovskii, B. I. (1976) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.2220760205 · Cited by 889
Clerc, J. P., Giraud, G., Laugier, J. M., & Luck, J. M. (1990) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018739000101501 · Cited by 692
Duality in field theory and statistical systems
Savit, R. (1980) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.453 · Cited by 631
Differences between Lattice and Continuum Percolation Transport Exponents
Halperin, B. I., Feng, S. C., & Sen, P. N. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.2391 · Cited by 513
Bergman, D. J., & Imry, Y. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.1222 · Cited by 447
Flicker (1f) Noise in Percolation Networks: A New Hierarchy of Exponents
Rammal, R., Tannous, C., Breton, P., & Tremblay, A. M. S. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1718 · Cited by 280
Dynamic Scaling near the Percolation Threshold in Thin Au Films
Laibowitz, R. B., & Gefen, Y. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.380 · Cited by 174
Field-theoretic approach to biconnectedness in percolating systems
Harris, A. B. (1983) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.28.2614 · Cited by 79
Octavio, M., Gutiérrez, G., & Aponte, J. (1987) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.36.2461 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Effect of chemical inhomogeneity in bismuth-based copper oxide superconductors
Eisaki, H., Kaneko, N., Feng, D. L., Damascelli, A., Mang, P. K., Shen, K. M., Shen, Z.-X., & Greven, M. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.064512 · Cited by 465
General features of latent track formation in magnetic insulators irradiated with swift heavy ions
Szenes, G. (1995) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.8026 · Cited by 393
Chiral Luttinger liquids at the fractional quantum Hall edge
Chang, A. M. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1449 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, Y., Lee, S.-I., & Gaines, J. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2004878313
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.