Cited by 17Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Perturbation study on the spin and charge susceptibilities of the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Open access
Hotta, Takashi, Fujimoto, Satoshi·1996·Physical Review B

Abstract

We investigate the spin and charge susceptibilities of the two-dimensional Hubbard model based upon the perturbative calculation in the strength of correlation U. For U comparable to a bare bandwidth, the charge susceptibility decreases near half filling as hole doping approaches zero. This behavior suggesting the precursor of the Mott-Hubbard gap formation cannot be obtained without the vertex corrections beyond the random-phase approximation. In the low-temperature region, the spin susceptibility deviates from the Curie-Weiss-like law and finally turns to decrease with the decrease of temperature. This spin-gap-like behavior originates from the van Hove singularity in the density of states. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.54.5381

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hamiltonian constraint acts by annihilating, creating, and rerouting angular-momentum quanta in units of ±h, ±h/2, and 0.

    “the Hamiltonian constraint acts by annihilating, creating and re-routing the quanta of angular momentum (with which the graphs of the so-called spin-network [28][29][30] states are 'coloured') in units of ±h, ±h/2, 0.”

    From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD) (1998) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Spin-network states form an orthonormal basis on the Hilbert space.

    “An orthonormal basis on H is given by the so-called spin-network states [28][29][30]”

    From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD) (1998) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 21 W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Tenkolsky and W. T. Vetterling : Numerical Recipes , (Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York, 1986), p.490.

Authors
Hotta, T., & Fujimoto, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1996-08-15
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
5381-5388
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2078156445
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B, Condensed matter (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
two-dimensional Hubbard model, spin susceptibility, charge susceptibility, Mott-Hubbard transition, spin gap, van Hove singularity, vertex corrections, random phase approximation, p-type doping, Curie-Weiss law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review