The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudopotential study of binding properties of solids within generalized gradient approximations: The role of core-valence exchange correlation
Open accessAbstract
In ab initio pseudopotential calculations within density-functional theory, the nonlinear exchange-correlation interaction between valence and core electrons is often treated linearly through the pseudopotential. We discuss the accuracy and limitations of this approximation regarding a comparison of the local-density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximations (GGA's), which we find to describe core-valence exchange-correlation markedly different. (1) Evaluating the binding properties of a number of typical solids, we demonstrate that the pseudopotential approach and the linearization of core-valence exchange correlation are both accurate and limited in the same way in the GGA as in the LDA. (2) Examining the practice to carry out GGA calculations using pseudopotentials derived within the LDA, we show that the ensuing results differ significantly from those obtained using pseudopotentials derived within the GGA. As principal source of these differences we identify the distinct behavior of core-valence exchange correlation in the LDA and GGA which, accordingly, contributes substantially to the GGA-induced changes of calculated binding properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Norm-Conserving Pseudopotentials
Hamann, D. R., Schlüter, M., & Chiang, C. (1979) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.1494 · Cited by 4,511
Analysis of separable potentials
Gonze, X., Stumpf, R., & Scheffler, M. (1991) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.8503 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Cited by
Fuchs, M., & Scheffler, M. (1999) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00201-x · Cited by 1,424
Self-citationNumerical atomic orbitals for linear-scaling calculations
Junquera, J., Paz, Ó., Sánchez-Portal, D., & Artacho, E. (2001) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.235111 · Cited by 1,147
Variational density-functional perturbation theory for dielectrics and lattice dynamics
Refson, K., Tulip, P. R., & Clark, S. J. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.155114 · Cited by 926
Meta-generalized gradient approximation: Explanation of a realistic nonempirical density functional
Perdew, J. P., Tao, J., Staroverov, V. N., & Scuseria, G. E. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1665298 · Cited by 567
Chen, J. G., Menning, C. A., & Zellner, M. B. (2008) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.02.001 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, M., Bockstedte, M., Pehlke, E., & Scheffler, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-01-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2134-2145
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W1968466890
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudopotential study of binding properties of solids within generalized gradient approximations: The role of core-valence exchange correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.57.2134
- The paper
- Fuchs, M., Bockstedte, M., Pehlke, E., & Scheffler, M. (1998). Pseudopotential study of binding properties of solids within generalized gradient approximations: The role of core-valence exchange correlation. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.57.2134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.