The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exciton-light coupling in single and coupled semiconductor microcavities: Polariton dispersion and polarization splitting
Abstract
A comprehensive theoretical and experimental study of linear exciton-light coupling in single and coupled semiconductor microcavities is presented: emphasis is given to angular dispersion and polarization effects in the strong-coupling regime. The phase delay in the dielectric mirrors carries a nontrivial angle and polarization dependence. The polarization splitting of cavity modes increases with internal angle as ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathrm{eff}}.$ Comparison with experimental results on a GaAs-based cavity with ${\mathrm{In}}_{0.13}{\mathrm{Ga}}_{0.87}\mathrm{As}$ QW's shows that a quantitative understanding of polariton dispersion and polarization splitting has been achieved. Coupling of two identical cavities through a central dielectric mirror induces an optical splitting between symmetric and antisymmetric modes. When QW excitons are embedded in both cavities at antinode positions, the system behaves as four coupled oscillators, leading to a splitting of otherwise degenerate exciton states and to separate anticrossing of symmetric and antisymmetric modes. These features are confirmed by experimental results on coupled GaAs cavities with ${\mathrm{In}}_{0.06}{\mathrm{Ga}}_{0.94}\mathrm{As}$ QW's. Finally, the polarization splitting in a coupled cavity is analyzed in detail and is in good agreement with the experimental findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carusotto, I., & Ciuti, C. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.299 · Cited by 1,996
Polariton lasing vs. photon lasing in a semiconductor microcavity
Deng, H., Weihs, G., Snoke, D., Bloch, J., & Yamamoto, Y. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2634328100 · Cited by 465
Observation of the optical spin Hall effect
Leyder, C., Romanelli, M., Karr, J. P., Giacobino, E., Liew, T. C. H., Glazov, M. M., Kavokin, A. V., Malpuech, G., & Bramati, A. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys676 · Cited by 404
Self-citationObservation of Half-Quantum Vortices in an Exciton-Polariton Condensate
Lagoudakis, K. G., Ostatnický, T., Kavokin, A. V., Rubo, Y. G., André, R., & Deveaud-Plédran, B. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177980 · Cited by 377
Self-citationKavokin, A. V., Baumberg, J. J., Malpuech, G., & Laussy, F. P. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198782995.001.0001 · Cited by 326
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Panzarini, G., Andreani, L. C., Armitage, A., Baxter, D., Skolnick, M. S., Astratov, V. N., Roberts, J. S., Kavokin, A. V., Vladimirova, M. R., & Kaliteevski, M. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-02-15
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5082-5089
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W1986478150
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exciton-light coupling in single and coupled semiconductor microcavities: Polariton dispersion and polarization splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.59.5082
- The paper
- Panzarini, G., Andreani, L. C., Armitage, A., Baxter, D., Skolnick, M. S., Astratov, V. N., Roberts, J. S., Kavokin, A. V., Vladimirova, M. R., & Kaliteevski, M. A. (1999). Exciton-light coupling in single and coupled semiconductor microcavities: Polariton dispersion and polarization splitting. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.5082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.