The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Size effects in the electrical resistivity of polycrystalline nanowires
Abstract
Grain-boundary and surface scattering are known to increase the electrical resistivity of thin metallic films and wires. The length scale at which these produce appreciable effects is of the order of the electronic mean free path. For the well-studied case of thin films, both mechanisms can, in principle, be used to explain the observed thickness dependence on resistivity. In order to evaluate which of these mechanisms is more relevant, we have carried out an experimental study of the width dependence of the resistivity of narrow thin-film polycrystalline gold wires (nanowires), and computed the expected behavior on the basis of both surface and grain-boundary scattering mechanisms independently. We find that the resistivity increases as wire width decreases in a manner which is dependent on the mean grain size and cannot be explained adequately by either model alone. We propose a modification to the well-known model of Mayadas and Shatzkes, incorporating the variation of mean grain size on wire dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct Measurement of Thermal Conductivity of Aluminum Nanowires
Stojanovic, N., Berg, J. M., Maithripala, D. H. S., & Holtz, M. (2009) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3216035 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Durkan, C., & Welland, M. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-05-15
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 14215-14218
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2084762888
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size effects in the electrical resistivity of polycrystalline nanowires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.61.14215
- The paper
- Durkan, C., & Welland, M. E. (2000). Size effects in the electrical resistivity of polycrystalline nanowires. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.61.14215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.