Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural studies of charge disproportionation and magnetic order inCaFeO3

Woodward, P. M., Cox, D. E., Moshopoulou, E., Sleight, A. W., Morimoto, S.·2000·Physical Review B

Abstract

The crystal and magnetic structures of ${\mathrm{CaFeO}}_{3}$ have been determined at 300 and 15 K using synchrotron x-ray and neutron powder-diffraction techniques. At 300 K, ${\mathrm{CaFeO}}_{3}$ adopts the ${\mathrm{GdFeO}}_{3}$ struture, space group Pbnm with unit-cell dimensions $a=5.32630(4),$ $b=5.35270(4),$ and $c=7.53986(6)\AA{}.$ This structure is distorted from the ideal perovskite structure by tilting of the ${\mathrm{FeO}}_{6}$ octahedra about [110] and [001]. The average Fe-O distance is 1.922(2) \AA{}, and the Fe-O-Fe angles are 158.4(2)\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} and 158.1(1)\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}. At 15 K the crystal structure belongs to space group ${P2}_{1}/n$ with $a=5.31182(3),$ $b=5.34775(4),$ $c=7.52058(5)\AA{}$ and $\ensuremath{\beta}=90.065(1)\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},$ and contains two distinct Fe sites. The average Fe-O bond length is 1.872(6) \AA{} about the one iron site, and 1.974(6) \AA{} about the second site, with bond valence sums of 4.58 and 3.48, respectively. This provides quantitative evidence for charge disproportionation, ${2\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}}^{4+}{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fe}}^{3+}{+\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}}^{5+},$ at low temperature. The temperature evolution of the lattice parameters indicates a second- (or higher-) order phase transition from the orthorhombic charge-delocalized state to the monoclinic charge-disproportionated state, beginning just below room temperature. The magnetic structure at 15 K is incommensurate, having a modulation vector [\ensuremath{\delta},0,\ensuremath{\delta}] with \ensuremath{\delta} \ensuremath{\sim}0.322, corresponding to one of the 〈111〉 directions in the pseudocubic cell. A reasonable fit to the magnetic intensities is obtained with the recently proposed screw spiral structure [S. Kawasaki et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 1529 (1998)], with Fe moments of 3.5 and $2.5{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B},$ respectively. However, a comparable fit is given by a sinusoidal amplitude-modulated model in which the Fe moments are directed along [010], which leaves open the possibility that the true magnetic structure may be intermediate between the spiral and sinusoidal models (a fan structure).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.62.844

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Woodward, P. M., Cox, D. E., Moshopoulou, E., Sleight, A. W., & Morimoto, S.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
844-855
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2326604213
Cited by
308
References
16
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.