The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spin-dependent tunneling conductance ofFe|MgO|Fesandwiches
Abstract
We present first-principles based calculations of the tunneling conductance and magnetoconductance of epitaxial $\mathrm{Fe}(100)|\mathrm{MgO}(100)|\mathrm{Fe}(100)$ sandwiches. Our results indicate that tunneling is much more interesting and complicated than the simple barrier model used previously. We obtain the following general results: (1) Tunneling conductance depends strongly on the symmetry of the Bloch states in the electrodes and of the evanescent states in the barrier layer. (2) Bloch states of different symmetry decay at different rates within the barrier. The decay rate is determined by the complex energy bands of the same symmetry in the barrier. (3) There may be quantum interference between the decaying states in the barrier. This leads to an oscillatory dependence of the tunneling current on ${k}_{\ensuremath{\Vert}}$ and a damped oscillatory dependence on barrier thickness. (4) Interfacial resonance states can allow particular Bloch states to tunnel efficiently through the barrier. For $\mathrm{Fe}(100)|\mathrm{MgO}(100)|\mathrm{Fe}(100)$ our calculations indicate that quite different tunneling mechanisms dominate the conductance in the two spin channels. In the majority channel the conductance is primarily via Bloch electrons with small transverse momentum. One particular state with ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}$ symmetry is able to effectively couple from the Fe into the MgO. In the minority channel the conductance is primarily through interface resonance states especially for thinner layers. We predict a large magnetoresistance that increases with barrier thickness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems
Datta, S. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805776 · Cited by 7,704
Cited by
Magnetic sensors and their applications
Lenz, J., & Edelstein, S. (2006) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2006.874493 · Cited by 1,312
A new spin on magnetic memories
Kent, A. D., & Worledge, D. C. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.24 · Cited by 873
Bader, S. D., & Parkin, S. S. P. (2010) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104123 · Cited by 700
Metzger, R. M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500459d · Cited by 380
Magnetic sensors-A review and recent technologies
Khan, M. A., Sun, J., Li, B., Przybysz, A., & Kosel, J. (2021) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ac0838 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, W. H., Zhang, X.-G., Schulthess, T. C., & MacLaren, J. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-01-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2003671162
- Cited by
- 2,102
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spin-dependent tunneling conductance ofFe|MgO|Fesandwiches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.63.054416
- The paper
- Butler, W. H., Zhang, X.-G., Schulthess, T. C., & MacLaren, J. M. (2001). Spin-dependent tunneling conductance ofFe|MgO|Fesandwiches. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.63.054416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.